the full harris
New member
- Feb 14, 2004
- 3,212
i disagree with all of you. unlimited foreigners is best.
we would just have a weaker league without the foreign players.
I don't think our national team would be any better for it. The players who play for the national team are mostly first team regulars with their clubs.
If we had less foreigners, do you think we would have a different squad of players playing for England?
No, we wouldn't.
The England team is the best England have, they are those players who are good enough to play for their clubs despite the foreign players. They are pushed harder by the foreign players they are playing with and against on a weekly basis, so if anything the national team would be worse without as many foreign players.
and thankfully, on this one, i am gonna get my way.
EDIT I see that whilst I was writing that, fatbadger and uncle buck were talking sense, so obviously i disagree with MOST of you, not ALL. EDIT
we would just have a weaker league without the foreign players.
I don't think our national team would be any better for it. The players who play for the national team are mostly first team regulars with their clubs.
If we had less foreigners, do you think we would have a different squad of players playing for England?
No, we wouldn't.
The England team is the best England have, they are those players who are good enough to play for their clubs despite the foreign players. They are pushed harder by the foreign players they are playing with and against on a weekly basis, so if anything the national team would be worse without as many foreign players.
and thankfully, on this one, i am gonna get my way.
EDIT I see that whilst I was writing that, fatbadger and uncle buck were talking sense, so obviously i disagree with MOST of you, not ALL. EDIT
Last edited: