dougdeep
New member
Do they play football in Scotland?
Do they play football in Scotland?
Dickhead!
Rangers were actually the better team in the first half and were denied a stonewall penalty just after the half-hour mark.
They played well for first 15 mins of 2nd half but when first, then second goals went in that was it!
They lost to the third best team in Spain who have some great players - plenty of positives can be taken from the way Rangers played tonight and if they play the tims on Sunday the way they played tonight the result will be a good win for the Gers!!
WATP
Any other country's top teams in the CL get that result and we'd be saying how plucky and resilient they were.
Not so for the sweaty socks![]()
As the SPL is generally a better standard than Div 3 of the English league in which we all support BHA then your comment defies all logic!!
Its not their fault their arteries and lungs are f***ed and they cannot go out in sunshine or they turn to dust, so don't do too well.
Mental, some of this drivel. Who was the first British club to win the f***ing thing?
Jocks on the whole are clued up about football, I find more than the average English punter. You dont get many post 96'ers up there. Its not their fault their arteries and lungs are f***ed and they cannot go out in sunshine or they turn to dust, so don't do too well.
Like all things Jock football, you can still hate them and want them to be in it. I hate all this The Champions League Should Only Be For Proper Teams Like Real Madrid rubbish, if people MEAN IT and are not just jock baiting. If they are, then keep it up.
Wow. Tell someone who cares. "Dickhead".
there is no reason scotland deserve automatic qualification spot for the champions league.
For a country that is football mad, the standard is shocking.
That really does not explain why it is that players who are shocking (or at best anonymous) in league 1, or even lower can then go on Scottish prem clubs. 2 immediately springing to mind are David Thompson and Leon Knight. Also, aside from the biggest 3 or 4 clubs some of the attendences would embarrass a Conference side. As an equivalent to England the Scots prem is made up of 2 lower prem sides, a couple of Championship sides, a couple of league 1 with the rest being league 2 or Conference. Got to hand it to them for range of ability though.As the SPL is generally a better standard than Div 3 of the English league in which we all support BHA then your comment defies all logic!!
That really does not explain why it is that players who are shocking (or at best anonymous) in league 1, or even lower can then go on Scottish prem clubs. 2 immediately springing to mind are David Thompson and Leon Knight. Also, aside from the biggest 3 or 4 clubs some of the attendences would embarrass a Conference side. As an equivalent to England the Scots prem is made up of 2 lower prem sides, a couple of Championship sides, a couple of league 1 with the rest being league 2 or Conference. Got to hand it to them for range of ability though.
That really does not explain why it is that players who are shocking (or at best anonymous) in league 1, or even lower can then go on Scottish prem clubs. 2 immediately springing to mind are David Thompson and Leon Knight. Also, aside from the biggest 3 or 4 clubs some of the attendences would embarrass a Conference side. As an equivalent to England the Scots prem is made up of 2 lower prem sides, a couple of Championship sides, a couple of league 1 with the rest being league 2 or Conference. Got to hand it to them for range of ability though.
The point with attendances is that - along with TV money - they are the main drivers of a club's income and so it's means to spend on players. Sugar daddies aside, the less income they get the less decent players they can afford, so the lower the standard of play. Consequently the likes of Celtic can spend like a mid-table English prem side, while the likes of Falkirk (who get lower gates than we do) can only spend like a league 1/2 side. How can Rangers and Celtics really be 'giants' if they are only ever competing with minnows?
Thats a fair point, and I doubt many would argue against it.
There has long been a chicken and egg situation when it comes to the money the Old Firm syphon off from the rest of the Scottish game. Should they get what little money is available to improve their performances in Europe for the greater good of Scotland, or should it be invested in the other clubs to improve the competitiveness of the league?
There is a frightening stat somewhere that says that the Old Firm take something like 70%+ of the money the Scottish game generates (on top of their gate money).
The other side of the coin however is that they other clubs have basically adopted a grow your own policy re players, and I think that the quality of the younger players beginning to come through is possibly as good as it has been for years. The Scots are even beginning to export some of that talent to England for decent(ish) money!