Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Quick question: what is the plural of 'go'?







KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
19,834
Wolsingham, County Durham
Well, I was making a point about plural v singular but yes, the tenses should agree too. I suppose my wrong example should have read 'were' arrested.

But if the example were "If 20 supporters were involved in a fight, how come only one were arrested", I think that would be correct because the conditional would take a subjunctive. Complicated business English grammar, innit?

Yup- I was just being pedantic. That new sentence does not sound right - sounds better with "was arrested", but that does not necessarily make it correct. English grammar really is a bit bonkers.
 


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
13,798
Almería
Gwylan;5479760But if the example were "If 20 supporters were involved in a fight said:
I'm fairly sure that's not right. The subjunctive can be used for second conditional sentences (If I were you, I'd do it) but it would be in the 'if' clause. It can also be used after 'wish', 'if only' or 'suppose' (I wish I were a millionaire).
 
Last edited:


Yup- I was just being pedantic. That new sentence does not sound right - sounds better with "was arrested", but that does not necessarily make it correct. English grammar really is a bit bonkers.
It doesn't sound right because it isn't right. The first "were" is a subjunctive. The second "were" shouldn't be. It should be the plain and simple "was".
 






Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,341
Uffern
One in four, refers to an average of a group. What about 25%?

Both plural, I feel.

You feel wrong. One is always a singular. 25 percent of kids are illiterate would be plural.

I'm fairly sure that's not right. The subjunctive can be used for second conditional sentences (If I were you, I'd do it) but it would be in the 'if' clause. It can also be used after 'wish', 'if only' or 'suppose' (I wish I were a millionaire).

I did say "I think", I wasn't sure. However, in this case, it is the second clause of the sentence. I really don't know the answer to this one - I need a real grammar hound.

Yup- I was just being pedantic. That new sentence does not sound right - sounds better with "was arrested", but that does not necessarily make it correct. English grammar really is a bit bonkers.

It sounds wrong because it was meant to be wrong. As I said, I was using an example to show how applying the plural form of a verb to a singular subject sounds wrong.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone
But surely everyone should know that nouns have plurals and verbs don't? This isn't really grammar - it's just the meaning of words.
A lot of people have no idea what a noun or verb is. Do you not watch much crap TV Lord B? Our country is full of idiots.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone






Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
You feel wrong. One is always a singular. 25 percent of kids are illiterate would be plural.

The Guardian produced a little guide to the English language and this is their take on it.

AowNkLcCEAAJ6bJ.jpg:large
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here