[Football] Potter [NOT] at Chelsea

[dazzer6666]

Potter been told his job is safe but results must improve

So, not safe then.

 

[Originunknown]

Make sure you let us know when you've decided where your latest football loyalties lie Swansman.

This must be a tough time for you.

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

So, not safe then.

Next 2 on-paper-winnable games v Fulham and Palace will decide the fate of the beardy fraud and his ever-expanding band of hangers-on

 

[Elbow750]

Next 2 on-paper-winnable games v Fulham and Palace will decide the fate of the beardy fraud and his ever-expanding band of hangers-on

So Chelsea lose to Fulham and we have a new dilemma. Do we want Palace to lose, or spank Chelsea and see the once great Graham struggling for survival !!!

Oh happy days..

 

[BrightonCottager]

Hopefully we'll (Fulham) prolong his misery tomorrow night.

 

[JamesAndTheGiantHead]

So Chelsea lose to Fulham and we have a new dilemma. Do we want Palace to lose, or spank Chelsea and see the once great Graham struggling for survival !!!

Oh happy days..

A 0 - 0 bore draw with 4 red cards apiece would be just the ticket.

 

[willalbion]

Potter been told his job is safe but results must improve

That’s a bit of a mixed message. You’re safe but… not really

 

[Bold Seagull]

So Chelsea lose to Fulham and we have a new dilemma. Do we want Palace to lose, or spank Chelsea and see the once great Graham struggling for survival !!!

Oh happy days..

If Chelsea draw with Fulham, then regardless of the Palace v Chelsea result, we would move into 6th if we beat Liverpool.

 

[ConfusedGloryHunter]

A Fulham draw suits us better and still comes with a side order of schadenfreude. A palarse win is technically the best result except who could in their heart of hearts really be happy with that?

Two draws please GP.

Miss you x

 

[Swansman]

Job is safe = means won't be sacked within a week or two. "Safe job" does not exist in a PL club.
Results must improve = if they keep winning 1 in 8, he'll be sacked. Everyone understands that.

 

[Coldeanseagull]

Job is safe = means won't be sacked within a week or two. "Safe job" does not exist in a PL club.
Results must improve = if they keep winning 1 in 8, he'll be sacked. Everyone understands that.

Or lynched

 

[Wrong-Direction]

.

 

[BadFish]

Of all the games shown since GP took over, I've only missed 4 full games plus another 4 first/second halfs and this includes all the (streamed/televised) friendlies and so on. Struggle to think that over 10% have seen more, could be wrong though.

The quotes are not exact word-by-word quotes but I've seen those exact opinions stated here.

So your quotes are not actually quotes?

There is a certain amount of your own interpretation involved. I think we are seeing the problem here. You have created a straw man arguments from your interpretation of what someone has said and applied that to all of us.

No wonder your arguments are so confused.

 

[Guinness Boy]

No - too confused. Ask me in a year.

Swinging like a windcock in a gale

 

[ManOfSussex]

Job is safe = means won't be sacked within a week or two. "Safe job" does not exist in a PL club.
Results must improve = if they keep winning 1 in 8, he'll be sacked. Everyone understands that.

If Chelsea lose tomorrow just remember - I survived the Turin world cup semi final in Italia '90, Warwickshire beating Sussex in the dark at Lord's in 1993 and Frank Bruno losing before he'd entered the ring in Vegas 96 against Tyson - best wishes and stay strong.

 

[Bold Seagull]

Swinging like a windcock in a gale

Wouldn’t it just be pointing in the direction of the wind?

 

[Swansman]

So your quotes are not actually quotes?

There is a certain amount of your own interpretation involved. I think we are seeing the problem here. You have created a straw man arguments from your interpretation of what someone has said and applied that to all of us.

No wonder your arguments are so confused.

Nope. That's a weird intepretation of what I've said.

 

[BadFish]

Nope. That's a weird intepretation of what I've said.

I don't think there is anything but a weird interpretation of what you have said. Because what you have said is weird.

I'm sorry but it comes across as one of two things. Either you are arguing with the mythical quote makers that didn't actually make the quotes because you did. Or you are passionately defending Potter against anyone that suggests he is anything less than a genius and can only be compared favourably to our new manager who we have no business liking or getting behind.

Feel free to make your point more succinctly if you like.

 

[Acker79]

Wasn't behind a paywall when I looked at it, but I think the telegraph does tend to paywall their articles eventually.

 

[Bozza]

Wasn't behind a paywall when I looked at it, but I think the telegraph does tend to paywall their articles eventually.

If you approach the article from google, you tend to get a free pass around the paywall.

Should be the top item here:

chelsea save our season