Okay, maybe a bit over the top. I apologise.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[News] Post Office Scandal -
- Thread starter Talby
- Start date
Which, given that their entire business is based on knowing people’s addresses, is pretty poor…
Think you’re just highlighting the general feeling and anger at those responsible for this horrendous case.
Maybe just use that same ditch instead...?
- Jul 10, 2003
- 26,347
Why not, Boris Johnson hasOdds that she'll get off on the grounds that complete incompetence isn't a crime?
I am interested to know, when you actually voted for Johnson to lead the British Government for the next 5 years were you aware that you were voting for a total incompetent, or were you one who was fooled by his Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona
Last edited:
GT49er
Well-known member
Neither.I am interested to know, when you actually voted for Johnson to lead the British Government for the next 5 years were you aware that you were voting for a total incompetent, or were you one who was fooled by his Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona
Worried Man Blues
Well-known member
I think the immense pressure she is now under and the thought of whether she could handle jail must pray on her mind
herecomesaregular
We're in the pipe, 5 by 5
Good, I hope she hasn't had a good night's sleep for 10 years. Innocent errors, accidents, stupidity or incompetence are sometimes understandable. However, I would allege she knew what she was doing and she's just bullshitting now. Quite different.
I am interested to know, when you actually voted for Johnson to lead the British Government for the next 5 years were you aware that you were voting for a total incompetent, or were you one who was fooled by his Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona
Ummmm…. I didn’t vote for him
- Jul 10, 2003
- 26,347
No, I'm fully aware you didn't, in the post I quoted you simply pointed out that Johnson was incompetent
@GT49er very publicly and proudly told NSC how he had voted for Johnson. I wondered why, given that he has since in the last few hours on this thread agreed that Johnson is completely incompetent and that people were fooled by his "Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona".
I simply asked which of his two observations were the reason behind his vote for Johnson
Last edited:
IMHO it’s much more satisfying to watch her get her comeuppance and have her reputation shredded in the courts
Deportivo Seagull
I should coco
So you think he’s political colossus? ….. I think I may have spelt colossus wrong …..
GT49er
Well-known member
'Neither' was my last word on the subject. Your presumptions that I had done this, agreed with that, and probably thought the other are all false. I realise, of course, that such assumptions fit with your ideas of how the world should be.No, I'm fully aware you didn't, in the post I quoted you simply pointed out that Johnson was incompetent
@GT49er very publicly and proudly told NSC how he had voted for Johnson. I wondered why, given that he has since in the last few hours on this thread agreed that Johnson is completely incompetent and that people were fooled by his "Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona".
I simply asked which of his two observations were the reason behind his vote for Johnson
- Jul 10, 2003
- 26,347
I would imagine Neither may well have been your last word, because it avoids you explaining whether you knew you were voting for someone completely incompetent or whether you "were fooled by his Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona".
Your words, not mine
My guess is Corbyn. Understandable.No, I'm fully aware you didn't, in the post I quoted you simply pointed out that Johnson was incompetent
@GT49er very publicly and proudly told NSC how he had voted for Johnson. I wondered why, given that he has since in the last few hours on this thread agreed that Johnson is completely incompetent and that people were fooled by his "Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona".
I simply asked which of his two observations were the reason behind his vote for Johnson
All a long time ago now, though...
You didn't fancy Corbyn? You were not alone. And a vote for most of the minor parties in most constituencies was a wasted vote. So, QED. I assume.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 26,347
Sorry H, you're miles out.
If you'd made loads of posts saying one thing and now claim the complete opposite, you know I'd call you out too
I'm thinking of changing my strap line to "Caller out of Bullshit' in honour of our old friend 'Bringer of Truth'
Mo Gosfield
Well-known member
- Aug 11, 2010
- 6,317
Speaking as someone who experienced a large financial loss at the hands of The Royal Mail, some years ago and just preceding the ' postmasters scandal ' I know exactly how they feel. The arrogance of a public funded body who effectively dared a group of us to take them to court, with the threat that their pockets were a lot deeper than ours.
It was a painful time for me and distresses me to see how others have suffered at the hands of people who thought they were untouchable and could ride roughshod over people's lives.
GT49er
Well-known member
Your assumptions, not mine. And I certainly don't owe you an explanation. Now go and play with your agenda...........................................and by the way, 'neither' means that I don't subscribe to either of your binary choices. Difficult one for you to get your head round, that?I would imagine Neither may well have been your last word, because it avoids you explaining whether you knew you were voting for someone completely incompetent or whether you "were fooled by his Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona".
Your words, not mine
.............and OK, if you want to be a smart arse (and you usually do), then 'neither' didn't eventually turn out to be my last word. But it's certainly all that you'll get from me.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #980
Yeah. A chap called Karl Flinders.