Poyningsgull
Well-known member
- Apr 12, 2007
- 1,801
Is required for all these idiots who think signing Murray is bad business.
Clueless, the lot of you.
Clueless, the lot of you.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Plonker Filter
- Thread starter Poyningsgull
- Start date
Prince Monolulu
Everything in Moderation
Is required for all these idiots who think signing Murray is bad business.
Clueless, the lot of you.
I am open minded on it. Do we know how much of his pittance we are responsible for weekly?
Norman Baker suck my lozenge
New member
Is required for all these idiots who think signing Murray is bad business.
Clueless, the lot of you.
Shame we haggled over a few quid a week back in January,he would've seen us over the line.
The pies are very good though.
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
Smug Eddie wouldn't let him go rather than we didn't offer enough was what I heard,
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Different fans have different opinion shocker!
Finchley Seagull
Well-known member
So I take it you know better than all reports that Howe wouldn't let him go. So negative. And your comment about pies at the end of all your posts is pathetic. Do you actually support Brighton?
Is required for all these idiots who think signing Murray is bad business.
Clueless, the lot of you.
You do know this is NSC right!
Where duelling with the clueless is the norm!!!
Reagulls
Well-known member
- Jul 22, 2013
- 782
We tried several times but just couldn't agree final terms apparently.
No idea but being as bournemouth wanted a sizeable loan fee back in january i cant see them covering much if any.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Don't feed the troll. Best ignore.
Sussex Nomad
Well-known member
It has been said on here, more than once, and probably on this thread that I can't be arsed to trawl through, that Mr Murray didn't want out. He was surplus to Poyets requirements and therefore went on a free. I simply do not get the division with people. If I was the said Glenn, I would have moved to any club, his isn't a Brightonian so why would he not go to the Pikeys? He has no affiliation with Brighton. He is back now and I am confident he can still be that 20 a season striker, and if anyone thinks he has some kind of love split, forget it. He is here to score goals. Simple as.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
I believe in Joe Hendry
- Oct 4, 2003
- 12,783
I would think we are going to be paying most, if not all, of his wages. No loan fee up front so if he's on the 30k a week as rumoured previously he'll be costing us just over £1.5million (not including the clubs employers NI contributions and other payments) for the season. If he can deliver anywhere near 20 goals it will be money well spent.
TSB
Captain Hindsight
What makes you the ****ing authority on what we should think?
****.
****.
kjgood
Well-known member
Don't see what the problem is really, most players are at a club because the club pays their wages just like my employer pays mine. I really dont care who he's played for in the past as long as he gives his all and respects our club whilst with us.
Remember in the main, players see football as their profession and a business, not a passion like fans think it is.
Remember in the main, players see football as their profession and a business, not a passion like fans think it is.
Norman Baker suck my lozenge
New member
Smug Eddie,apparently wanted us to pay all his wages,we were only willing to pay half,Shame,what would only have been about another 150-200k would almost certainly seen us over the line,Ho-hum.
The spinach and ricotta by the way had Burnley and Boro green with envy.
Is required for all these idiots who think signing Murray is bad business.
Clueless, the lot of you.
He's a tennis player though, isn't he?
- Jun 27, 2012
- 15,387
textbook. Keep going.