Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Please Chris
- Thread starter bhanutz
- Start date
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
Or we could just return to last season's formation. 4-4-2 with Sidwell back in the team. I like the 3 in CM in theory but at the moment they are not working as a unit.
Mike Small
Well-known member
- Dec 26, 2008
- 3,366
Absolutely agreed. Start AK next week for a start.
jamie the seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 27, 2011
- 2,803
So hard when we have no pace out wide or up top.
Both Citeh and LCFC defence never felt under threat as we were never going to get behind them.
Both Citeh and LCFC defence never felt under threat as we were never going to get behind them.
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ
Hove / Παρος
..................... Ryan .....................
Bruno ... Duffy ... Dunk ... Suttner
........ Stephens .... Sidwell...........
March .... Knockaert .... Izquierdo
.............. New Striker .................
For me
Bruno ... Duffy ... Dunk ... Suttner
........ Stephens .... Sidwell...........
March .... Knockaert .... Izquierdo
.............. New Striker .................
For me
Mike Small
Well-known member
- Dec 26, 2008
- 3,366
No way CH would go for that sadly. More cautious but still more ambitious than the side he puts out currently would be Propper in for March or Izquierdo. Could try and win the midfield then with 3 centre midfielders and not Gross who quite frankly doesn't seem to know where he is playing. Also, Rosenior in for Suttner.Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;8078545 said:..................... Ryan .....................
Bruno ... Duffy ... Dunk ... Suttner
........ Stephens .... Sidwell...........
March .... Knockaert .... Izquierdo
.............. New Striker .................
For me
GreersElbow
New member
You constantly spout this bullshit idea that he plays a cautious side. 2 wingers and CAM/striker....
That isn't cautious. Our lack of a pacey striker is what's holding us back.
- Thread starter
- #9
Well I wouldn't...
Mike Small
Well-known member
- Dec 26, 2008
- 3,366
'Spout the idea'? I'll give you some examples then:
1) playing Murphy instead of AK. Who is more of a threat going forwards and gives us some belief and impetus? Youll say he is injured but why not start with him then take him off. It's hard to affect a game coming on.
2) setting up with 10 men behind the ball against city. I wouldn't criticise this too much as we could have got a valuable point but this is a fact and is ummm cautious.
3) waiting for late in the game to make a sub. Why not bring on AK at half time yesterday to change the flow of the game? CH wanted to 'stay in the game' which means keeping the ineffective Gross and Murphy on.
I still think CH can keep us up though and yes I agree with you a pacey and powerful forward would change a lot for the team.
Not a chance of doing it how others want it. HE is the one who will live or die by his methods so he has to do it HIS way - He has never been relegated. Despite what Norwich fans say and the tough run in he had when he got sacked there. The fact remains he was 5 points clear of the bottom 3 with only 4 or 5 games to play.
Kalimantan Gull
Well-known member
mune ni kamome
Well-known member
Jesus wept we are two games in for God's sake. It will take half a dozen games to settle the new players in
and gel
and gel
Clacker kid
Banned
- Aug 12, 2017
- 12
Christopher's best form of attack is defence.
Sussex Nomad
Well-known member
I agree with 4-4-2 against those outside the top six. We looked ok when we reverted yesterday, albeit using a makeshift centre forward.
Usual 5
AK...(2 from)Gross/Stephens/Propper .... March
............Jose
.........Hemed or Murray.
AK...(2 from)Gross/Stephens/Propper .... March
............Jose
.........Hemed or Murray.
Wellesley
Well-known member
- Jul 24, 2013
- 4,973
"If we lose, we lose...." ? - who the **** wants to lose??
The clue is in his username.