Official - First Test - England V Pakistan.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



larus

Well-known member
Got here first :lolol: .

Lords 11:00 start.

England (probable) 1 Marcus Trescothick, 2 Andrew Strauss (capt), 3 Alastair Cook, 4 Kevin Pietersen, 5 Paul Collingwood, 6 Ian Bell, 7 Geraint Jones (wk), 8 Liam Plunkett, 9 Matthew Hoggard/Jon Lewis, 10 Steve Harmison, 11 Monty Panesar

Pakistan (probable) 1 Salman Butt, 2 Imran Farhat, 3 Faisal Iqbal, 4 Mohammad Yousuf, 5 Inzamam-ul-Haq (capt), 6 Shahid Afridi, 7 Abdul Razzaq 8 Kamran Akmal (wk), 9 Mohammad Sami, 10 Umar Gul, 11 Danish Kaneria

Need Hoggy to get the all clear for this one, otherwise our bowling attack looks too fragile. Mind you, so does our batting at the moment :ohmy: .
 




Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,878
Burgess Hill
larus said:
Got here first :lolol: .

Lords 11:00 start.

England (probable) 1 Marcus Trescothick, 2 Andrew Strauss (capt), 3 Alastair Cook, 4 Kevin Pietersen, 5 Paul Collingwood, 6 Ian Bell, 7 Geraint Jones (wk), 8 Liam Plunkett, 9 Matthew Hoggard/Jon Lewis, 10 Steve Harmison, 11 Monty Panesar

Pakistan (probable) 1 Salman Butt, 2 Imran Farhat, 3 Faisal Iqbal, 4 Mohammad Yousuf, 5 Inzamam-ul-Haq (capt), 6 Shahid Afridi, 7 Abdul Razzaq 8 Kamran Akmal (wk), 9 Mohammad Sami, 10 Umar Gul, 11 Danish Kaneria

Need Hoggy to get the all clear for this one, otherwise our bowling attack looks too fragile. Mind you, so does our batting at the moment :ohmy: .

...and the less said about our fielding, the better
 


Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,419
West Sussex
and the officials are:

Umpires: SA Bucknor and SJA Taufel
TV umpire: PJ Hartley
Match referee: RS Madugalle
Reserve umpire: RK Illingworth
 
Last edited:


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
32,231
Uffern
That Pakistan batting (even without Younis) looks strong: Kamran Akmal at 8 (gulp).

The bowling looks a bit weak though: high-scoring draw I reckon.
 


RonnieO'Sullivan

New member
Feb 21, 2005
2,823
Gwylan said:
That Pakistan batting (even without Younis) looks strong: Kamran Akmal at 8 (gulp).

The bowling looks a bit weak though: high-scoring draw I reckon.

loooks weak compared to there normal bowling line up but...

with Sami and Gul opening the bowling there is wickets there...

then a very dangerous Danish Kaneria to come into the attack with Razzaq and Afridi also very capable bowlers tere is still enough there to worry England in my view....
 








Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,878
Burgess Hill
Grendel said:
We're going to get slaughtered, I fear.

Well, we need to bowl and field a lot better than we did against SL.
 








Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,878
Burgess Hill
Yup, he's in, some interesting news from Cricinfo (see 10:05am below) :-

10.30
Inzamam-ul-Haq called heads and it came down tails. Andrew Strauss has chosen to bat.

It's all getting very, very exciting. I've just taken one for the team and made the first cup of tea of the day. One down, nine to go. And lo! Jenny Thompson has arrived.

10.20
Hoggard's been passed fit - here is the England team. News of Pakistan to follow.

1 Marcus Trescothick, 2 Andrew Strauss (capt), 3 Alastair Cook, 4 Kevin Pietersen, 5 Paul Collingwood, 6 Ian Bell, 7 Geraint Jones (wk), 8 Liam Plunkett, 9 Matthew Hoggard, 10 Steve Harmison, 11 Monty Panesar

10.05am
It's looking like Hoggard will be playing. But, more excitingly, is the news that there was a bit of a stand-off between the two camps. Pakistan wanted to bowl on the same strip England's bowlers were practising on...and they were told to clear off, in no uncertain terms. No evidence of any fist-fights or Zidane moments yet.
 




Trigger

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
40,458
Brighton
larus said:
Good news.

Anyone know how log Simon Jones is out for now? Could really do with him 'fit' again for the Ashes.
Due back a month before the team fly to Oz all being well... Will have to prove he is fit.
 




Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,878
Burgess Hill
ChapmansThe Saviour said:
I want to be a summariser for cricinfo. Perfect job or WHAT?

I bet the pay is lousy though!
 




Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
32,231
Uffern
Wanderer said:
I bet the pay is lousy though!

After working at The Cricketer for a couple of weeks, I was offered a job on the magazine - the pay was so lousy that I would have been surviving on mouldy cheese sandwiches and water for a couple of years.

When I pointed this out to the bods on the magazine, I was told "Yes, we were looking for someone with a private income". :lolol:

I'm from Moulsecoomb; to our family a private income was when one of my dad's racing tips came off.
 
Last edited:


Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,878
Burgess Hill
43/0 sixth over
 




Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,878
Burgess Hill
52/0 off 51 balls

Is this 20/20 !!
 




Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
47,244
at home
tresco is out
 


larus

Well-known member
60/1 - 11.5 overs.

:(

In Cricinfo words....

11.5 Umar Gul to Trescothick, OUT, but he’s gone now, plays away from his body – a willy, wally waft outside off-stump, gets a thin outside edge straight to Akmal. Pakistan strike
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top