I bet there are one or two drippy twats who send about 50 "reports" every month. Am I right?But I like you x
I bet there are one or two drippy twats who send about 50 "reports" every month. Am I right?But I like you x
I DO like a flounce. Good stuff, it's been a while.Can't be bothered with mods that think they are above themselves. Laters.
Ladies and gentlemen, I think we may have a flounce...
I bet there are one or two drippy twats who send about 50 "reports" every month. Am I right?
It should be quite simple when you get one of those. Just ask yourself what Diana would think, and act accordingly.That's classified, but there are fewer reports than perhaps people might think.
The ones that get me are the 'WE don't want NSC ending up like......'.
The great thing (I think) about this board is it's diversity. Even the racists (and I think you know who I am referring to) toe the line.
I've just sent another one asking for you to be banned.
Do I win £5?
Bah. He'll bugger off to NSP and slag everyone off there now.No fiver I'm afraid, but I got the reported post and he is now duly banned![]()
![]()
Bah. He'll bugger off to NSP and slag everyone off there now.![]()
was ankeran dogshite when he kept out that goal bound effort in the first half by clawing it away? just asking like
What DOES f*** us off at mod towers is when people report a post and demand a ban for the poster involved.
It's the equivalent of running to a referee and brandishing an imaginary red card, which we always decry when we see it at matches.
Now thats odd though, you say we need to report the stuff that we don't like and you'll take a look, but then you get f***ed off when we do and just so happen to request a ban?
I think El meant that people report the post, and are also then demanding the punishment they choose. i.e. "this person insulted me, ban him" when what they want is "this person insulted me" they then take a look and see what punishment they think is appropriate.
I agree, however there are a lot of reasonable fans on here too! I guess the good thing is nsc is now becoming more widespread opinion based forum instead of a clique for a select few.
Yep - I see your point - although on reflection if a great deal of people are calling for some fans of other clubs to be banned then how should they do this?
Say we're in a general consensus we need to limit the amount of opposition fans who come on here simply as a wind up, and add nothing except vitriol and often homophobic drivel, shouldn't we express that to the mods by requesting it? Or is there another, possibly better way I can't think of...
Isn't that more of a general policy discussion (which in part is happening in this thread, and in this other one: part in Should piss-taking opposing supporters be banned from the Big Board ) and so isn't something that can be appropriately discussed in individual post reports? I would imagine if they find that lots of people are reporting the same type of threads, it should lead to a consensus view. Or am I misunderstanding?
Was it?
NSC is/was a small proportion of our fanbase opinion and those who dare spoke out against those NSC regulars were shit down in flames. With our " new" fans joining the NSC community the opinion on all topics is far more widespread and pretty much a more true opinion of an albion fan instead of the sometimes blinkered view of those of the pre Falmer NSC ?