London Calling
New member
Ex Shelton Seagull said:This doesn't just apply to us, it seems to be a crackdown by the Football authorities across the whole league. Take a look at some West Ham messageboards and you'll see that this arguement has been raging for days now. West Ham have had their away allocation for the game against Nottingham Forest cut because large sections of their support won't sit down. I think a certain amount of lee-way was given in regards to standing in all-seater grounds over the past few years but that time seems to be at an end. It may have something to do with fear of litigation, somebody could be injured or have their view obstructed by people standing in a seated area, then sue the club for not making sure people were following the rules and regulations. It's also a lot easier to identify and locate "trouble-makers" in all-seater grounds. Of course we all know that it's up to the people in charge what constitues a "trouble-maker". I'm sure Archer and Bellotti would have loved it if the Goldstone had been all-seater during the "war years".
Terracing at Football League grounds has nearly disappeared and it's not coming back anytime soon. Why? Money, that's why. Clubs and chairmen can make a lot more money charging for seats than they could for terracing. This is despite the Taylor report quite clearly stating that admission prices should not rise by a large amount. The Labour party made a lot of noise about bringing in German style terracing when it was in opposition but as soon as it go into power it performed a complete about-turn (what a surprise) and said that terracing was not on the agenda.
German football fans fought very hard to preserve cheap standing areas in stadiums and they were succesful. Plus clubs aren't run in the same way as ours are, profit is not the prime motivation of most Chairmen in Germany. Football clubs are part of sporting societies in Germany, providing a range of activites for the communities they represent. As a result they tend to treat supporters more like customers, unlike the way we are treated in this country as a captive audience. When supporters over there spoke, the clubs listened. Football clubs have never been run in this way in this country, they have always been vehicles that make the people that run them a lot of money and power.
It seems that quite a few people are becoming disillusioned with football, mainly men in their late twenties to early forties who enjoyed standing on the terraces. Football nowadays seems very rigid, constraints have been placed on nearly everything we can do or say in a football ground. For many the football ground was a place where we could be free from social constraints, where we could shout and swear and sing. The terrace allowed a kind of freedom, a place where we could join with others and form a a kind of collective. On a terrace there was a freedom of movement that allowed us to feel much more like a group, allowed us to feell much more like supporters. In all-seated stadia we are split into rows and individual seats. There is much less freedom and as a result it is harder to form that collective. As a result the atmosphere suffers.
I know that all-seater grounds are much better for families. There are far more kids attending football than the eighties. There are lots more women attending. I know that Football has opened up to a lot of people since the days of Hillsborough and all-seater grounds have played a part in this. It just seems to us men in our twenties/thirties and forties that football doesn't really want our custom, that we aren't especially welcome. Yet we are the ones who make up the majority of football supporters. The clubs seem to think that they can just rely on our eve-lasting support and they shouldn't be so complacent. This all-seater crackdown may be the final straw for a few people.
A great note.
LC