He did come in from the side and his arm was going up to meet gross neck (not head )actually , your manager blaming the weather was far much funnier , think that BHA should ask Webb for the VAR HQ recording of the incident ....
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] No Fulham red card
- Thread starter AlbionBro
- Start date
Indeed. He might as well had said rhubarb rhubarb for good his interview was. He'd have been squealing like a stuck pig if it was the other way round, prick.
- Apr 5, 2014
- 23,610
It's 'You're'
Oh..
It's contagious. I shall send myself to the Argus Comments Colony.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,297
You shouldn’t of posted that.
happypig
Staring at the rude boys
"He ran round the corner into my knife Your Honour. Twice. Backwards."
schmunk
"Members"
Oh deer! Hell of your guts four starters.
- Apr 5, 2014
- 23,610
Ah, someone to keep me company in Argus Comments. Although I fear, despite you're strong opinions, you would be a little conciliatory.
BluesRockDJ
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,092
Couple of points for you.........has your club thought about entering the
Oscars for acting ? Lost count of how many of your players reacted like being shot........even your 'keeper went down with cramp !
Also the chant "Here For The Fulham" after the attendance was announced..........................no comment !
brighton_tom
Well-known member
- Jul 23, 2008
- 4,871
Probably better to sometimes just say yeah he got away with one there.
albionalex
Well-known member
The VAR Review: Man City penalty that sparked derby win at United
Why did Manchester City get a penalty in the derby? Was it correct to give a penalty to Newcastle United against Wolverhampton Wanderers?
"VAR review: As the referee didn't see this incident clearly, the VAR, Peter Bankes, is making a judgement on whether the challenge reached the threshold for a red-card intervention.
Palhinha is fortunate because he catches Groß in the face and there does appear to be some kind of movement, but he escapes sanction because there was no definitive swinging motion or deliberate act. That he caught Groß with his upper arm rather than his elbow would also have been factored into the VAR's decision.
A yellow card on-field would have been the better outcome, but the VAR cannot relay this to Salisbury."
Curious Orange
Punxsatawney Phil
Well, it doesn't look better with repeat viewings. This is a short on the Albion's YouTube channel.
1066familyman
Radio User
- Jan 15, 2008
- 15,185
I agree that it was the upper arm and not the elbow, which is just as well, as had it been the elbow then we could have been looking at a really serious injury, as it was definitely a 'definitive swinging motion and deliberate act'!The VAR Review: Man City penalty that sparked derby win at United
Why did Manchester City get a penalty in the derby? Was it correct to give a penalty to Newcastle United against Wolverhampton Wanderers?www.espn.com
"VAR review: As the referee didn't see this incident clearly, the VAR, Peter Bankes, is making a judgement on whether the challenge reached the threshold for a red-card intervention.
Palhinha is fortunate because he catches Groß in the face and there does appear to be some kind of movement, but he escapes sanction because there was no definitive swinging motion or deliberate act. That he caught Groß with his upper arm rather than his elbow would also have been factored into the VAR's decision.
A yellow card on-field would have been the better outcome, but the VAR cannot relay this to Salisbury."
How can they possibly not see that on replay? In real time, yes, it's hard to see, but on replay it's as clear as day.
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Cramp for a keeper is an absolute joke…..same theatrics as last game against them at the Amex
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
It’s probably best not to give up the day job for the comedy circuit just yet
This is worse than when Senator Agsby claimed that he had the rare blood disorder ‘Prestadidwicks Congena' to excuse why he splashed those poor people on that fateful day many years ago.
Yes, yes - but just look at the rain on that clip! It was raining you know!
BrightonCottager
Well-known member
Yeah, he got away with one there. As I said earlier, it perhaps evens up the the yellow he got for cleanly tackling Lamptey last season and Mitoma getting away with almost garroting Harry Wilson in about the 62nd minute, so it's all square innit?
As for the singing of 'You're only here for the Fulham', it was in jest - we had our tongues firmly in our cheeks, although it seems the last 2 seasons have changed some of the general goodwill towards us from some Albion fans.
As for playacting, it's been a feature this season that opponents go down as if shot when they get anywhere near Palhiñha, including yesterday. I don't approve of it, so it was doubly nice to see Palhiñha pulling Pereira up off the ground when got a boot in the chest, and some of your fans applauding it.
You will be unsurprised and delighted to know Palhiñha was voted our Man of the Match. You can watch his highlights here.
albionalex
Well-known member
What?
American Seagle
Well-known member
- Jun 14, 2022
- 703
Oh come on. It was so obviously deliberate. It's just embarrassing that they say that.The VAR Review: Man City penalty that sparked derby win at United
Why did Manchester City get a penalty in the derby? Was it correct to give a penalty to Newcastle United against Wolverhampton Wanderers?
"VAR review: As the referee didn't see this incident clearly, the VAR, Peter Bankes, is making a judgement on whether the challenge reached the threshold for a red-card intervention.
Palhinha is fortunate because he catches Groß in the face and there does appear to be some kind of movement, but he escapes sanction because there was no definitive swinging motion or deliberate act. That he caught Groß with his upper arm rather than his elbow would also have been factored into the VAR's decision.
A yellow card on-field would have been the better outcome, but the VAR cannot relay this to Salisbury."