New rumour: We have made an enquiry for a QPR player

[Jimmy Grimble]

His first loan spell here, he was very good in centre midfield. Espically that goal he scored against Rushden & Diamonds. But his second loan spell here, he wasn't particulary good. So I doubt we would be after Rehmann again.

Could the manager in charge have an affect on it though? he was good the first time but shit under Wilkins...

 

[Basil Fawlty]

Could the manager in charge have an affect on it though? he was good the first time but shit under Wilkins...

Maybe, because we were playing him at centre back at the time. But I don't think, we would bring him back here. I think MA has his attentions on a few others, and it aint him.

 

[Jimmy Grimble]

Maybe, because we were playing him at centre back at the time. But I don't think, we would bring him back here. I think MA has his attentions on a few others, and it aint him.

I would hope so.

 

[lizard]

Why?

Zesh is not fit to wear the shirt, he wanted out on us and anyone who will not give 110% is a waste of time in my opinion. I was glad to see him go, he's no Albion player.
We need solid, quality players, which he isn't.

 

[steward 433]

Zesh is not fit to wear the shirt, he wanted out on us and anyone who will not give 110% is a waste of time in my opinion. I was glad to see him go, he's no Albion player.
We need solid, quality players, which he isn't.

Like has been said earlier

Has great potential under Adams

Played awful under Wilkins

The manager obviously had a lot of influence on him

 

[steward 433]

to be fair i haven't seen him play since he left us

 

[lizard]

I just think he'll bring the rest of the team down.
Do we really want someone like that in the squad?
I think there are plenty more better signings that Adams could make, but if Adams decides he's the right signing i will stand by his decision and look forward to him proving me wrong.

I have total faith in Micky.

 

[BensGrandad]

Lets hope it is not Rehman that we are after because we have let better players go i.e Mayo Hart etc. Rehman has shown that he is not conference standard either in his first or last loan with us.

 

[saltash seagull]

rehman was shit in his 1st loan spell,good goal and performance at rushden and then went downhill big time

i pressume barker is chris? richie's brother,think he was getting linked down here with argyle the other week he has always seemed ok to me

 

[B.W.]

With El-Bad, and Virgo TODAY! , we surely don't need Rehman too...

 

[eastlondonseagull]

Rehman was like a roman candle. He was spectacular at the beginning and really lit the team up. But he soon fizzled out into something less than useless, and just left a bad smell in the end.




I've read that analogy again, and I'm satisfied it works.

I tend to agree there, Easy. Oh, and he's in my QPR mate's all-time worst XI.

.

 

[Albion Dan]

Dear oh Dear, I can only conclude that those people saying theyd be happy with Rehman have escaped the funny farm for the day.

He was complete and utter turd during both loan spells except fo his first two games.

One fo the worst players I have seen in the stripes, and I dont rate him as being any better than a lower div 2 standard player who has somehow managed to get 2 decent contracts and has been well found out now.

 

[Billy the Fish]

Zesh Rehman was a regular in the Railway in Burgess Hill. I remember my mate telling him he needed to try a bit harder
If he put half as much effort in on the pitch as he did chasing the little slagboats round Burgess Hill then he might be an ok player

 

[severnside gull]

If he put half as much effort in on the pitch as he did chasing the little slagboats round Burgess Hill then he might be an ok player

no danger of improving then

 

[vulture]

Rehman was good in one game against Rushden after that he was poor at best and total and utter shite at worst

 

[johnny jigsaw]

A poster on the Argus says the player is Martin Rowlands. Now that would be good!