That relationship I.e. Forest and Owner, isn’t going to end well I fear.This might be something to do with his comments after the owner came on the pitch to have a go at Nuno. Looks like he's a sensitive little flower is Marinakis
That relationship I.e. Forest and Owner, isn’t going to end well I fear.This might be something to do with his comments after the owner came on the pitch to have a go at Nuno. Looks like he's a sensitive little flower is Marinakis
Are you a bastion of free speech then? I see you rightly voiced some kind of objection.How come all these bastions of free speech aren't all over this?
The owner can’t make this decision it has to be the trust.Are you a bastion of free speech then? I see you rightly voiced some kind of objection.
That said, the owner can do what he wants, but it won’t stop Neville voicing his opinion, and as we know this will not make the owner look strong but weak.
Who guards the guards?The owner can’t make this decision it has to be the trust.
Trust the trust.![]()
Which bastions did you have in mind?How come all these bastions of free speech aren't all over this?
Shame couldn’t have got rid of Carragher as well.
More specifically those who supposedly stand up for free speech but have a problem with Gary Lineker exercising his freedom of speech on the basis he is a football pundit and his views should only be about football, but in this instance, Gary Neville is also employed as a football pundit and did express a view which was football related. Where are those voices? Or did I miss that?Which bastions did you have in mind?
Sensitive fat bloke bans Sky pundit from the football ground he owns.
Nope. The earth hasn't moved for me. What am I missing here?![]()
Completely unrelated and you know it.More specifically those who supposedly stand up for free speech but have a problem with Gary Lineker exercising his freedom of speech on the basis he is a football pundit and his views should only be about football, but in this instance, Gary Neville is also employed as a football pundit and did express a view which was football related. Where are those voices? Or did I miss that?
banning someone because they criticise you is a VERY dangerous precedent in this day and age of TrumpismI quite like GN as a pundit I'd probably like JC as well if I understood the language he speaks, it's up to Forest who they let in, it's not like Sky Sports run football is it.![]()
Oh I see, yes.More specifically those who supposedly stand up for free speech but have a problem with Gary Lineker exercising his freedom of speech on the basis he is a football pundit and his views should only be about football, but in this instance, Gary Neville is also employed as a football pundit and did express a view which was football related. Where are those voices? Or did I miss that?
They would have contract with the premier league which would state the Premier League's main broadcasters and sponsors would be allowed exclusive access to stadia, players etc which those sponsors pay alot of money for, so Forest are contractually obliged to let him inI quite like GN as a pundit I'd probably like JC as well if I understood the language he speaks, it's up to Forest who they let in, it's not like Sky Sports run football is it.![]()
No they’re not. They can ban anyone they like.They would have contract with the premier league which would state the Premier League's main broadcasters and sponsors would be allowed exclusive access to stadia, players etc which those sponsors pay alot of money for, so Forest are contractually obliged to let him in
Gladiators is about his level l think.Hiring Clattenburg did them no favours
Trust the trust.
it's not like Sky Sports run football is it.