little al
Crystal Palace fan
Is it even possible to drink 3 bottles of vodka a day, and sustain that amount? I would be dead in a month, and I love a drink.
LATEST NEWS.........The government have done another U Turn and dropped the idea
Is it even possible to drink 3 bottles of vodka a day, and sustain that amount? I would be dead in a month, and I love a drink.
A colleague of mine dealt with a bloke last week who was drinking screenwash, so yes, yes they would.
Cameron was crapping on about putting a stop to 'supermarkets selling cans of lager for 25p'
Now what I need to know is where he does his shopping- and I need to know now!
A colleague of mine dealt with a bloke last week who was drinking screenwash, so yes, yes they would.
No wonder so many young adults are "pre loading" these days. I see it all the time in London and I'm sure you do in Brighton. Youngsters sh** faced before they go out to save money.
Problem is out in the club when you are already drunk, you probably care less about the money and have a few too many drinks.
So (and here is the controversial bit) I think its the expensive alcohol in pubs and clubs that has created the market and demand for cheap alcohol.
A colleague of mine dealt with a bloke last week who was drinking screenwash, so yes, yes they would.
This minimum price thing is one of the most absurd and illogical government ideas I have ever heard. It will not control alcohol intake any more than ever increasing tax on fags controls smoking or outlawing drugs stops people rolling a spliff. It's a lazy token effort at best and a cynical new revenue stream at worst.
Well that's great news for hospitals and police stations on a Friday and Saturday night then. This has to be the government's biggest mistake since they were in power. I don't drink but sometimes go out on Friday and Saturday nights and see people behaving like complete twats after a few too many sherbets.
This was a chance for David Cameron to send out a strong message that alcohol kills and is a blight on Britain but completely lost his nerve on this one.
Spineless fool.
It will not control alcohol intake any more than ever increasing tax on fags controls smoking
But it would help, just as people have cut down on smoking because they can't afford it.
You dont day ... !!!
Well I do and I too sometimes go out on a Friday night, usually consume more units that some transient body has designated that is good for me.
Just like the vast majority of like minded people and I laugh till my sides split, bond with friends and colleagues reaffirm friendships and then toddle home without disrespecting the police, without log jamming the A&E department.
I do not know if you are a 'sick quitter' when it comes to alcohol, but you have a very narrow minded view of the responsible drinker, if in fact you recognise any responsible consumer of alcohol is valid.
So you just as this body of doctors should not impact on my life choices, give me the facts and allow us educated, sensible adults to make a considered judgement, without imposed sanctions.
But it would help, just as people have cut down on smoking because they can't afford it.
A colleague of mine dealt with a bloke last week who was drinking screenwash, so yes, yes they would.
It's not a tax. The government wouldn't get a penny from it.Something needs to be done about the levels of alcohol consumption in this country, especially in teenagers, but slapping more tax on Alcohol, is a lazy and very convenient way for the government to raise even more revenue on a already over burdened general public.
I'm not sure it would have effected the group out on a Friday/Saturday, as any drink bought in a pub etc wouldn't be effected - it's only cheap drinks in the supermarket that would be effected.Well that's great news for hospitals and police stations on a Friday and Saturday night then. This has to be the government's biggest mistake since they were in power. I don't drink but sometimes go out on Friday and Saturday nights and see people behaving like complete twats after a few too many sherbets.
Of course it wouldn't cure all problems. It wouldn't even cure most problems. But if it cured some problems, that would be a good thing.The trouble with minimum pricing is that it isn't a "silver bullet" that will cure all problems because there are a whole raft of problems associated with alcohol; health, public order, crime etc.
My solution, and I know it wouldn't find favour with many is that only pubs are allowed to sell alcohol, for drinking there and for take away.
But what about those that are already buying the cheapest thing - could it reduce the amount they drink? And this idea wasn't solely to help alcoholics, it was to reduce the amount that young people (with small amounts of money) binge drink.If the minimum price does rise then alchoholics of the minute would just drink the next cheapest thing.
Ouch. Good luck.Me, how do i know? 60+ units per day, every day. Detox. Dry for 14 weeks (****, **** ****!). Gave in.
But increasing the price of cigarettes has reduced the amount that people smoke - it has worked. And it's not a new revenue stream is it, because it's not a tax. Not that you'd care about the facts, you just want to bash anything the tory's do (fun for a bit, but it gets boring quickly).This minimum price thing is one of the most absurd and illogical government ideas I have ever heard. It will not control alcohol intake any more than ever increasing tax on fags controls smoking or outlawing drugs stops people rolling a spliff. It's a lazy token effort at best and a cynical new revenue stream at worst.
Of course you're right there, education is better, but education isn't enough on it's own. Cigarettes are the best example - everyone knows smoking is bad for you (while small amounts of alcohol are not bad for you), but people still do it. Education will not stop them, and price increases will not stop all of them, but it has helped.I'm not convinced. As with most things I prefer to educate rather than legislate
...
Jacking up the prices is not really addressing the root cause is it?