Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Minimum alcohol pricing







Durlston

"Garlic bread!?"
NSC Patron
Jul 15, 2009
9,765
Haywards Heath
LATEST NEWS.........The government have done another U Turn and dropped the idea:rave::drink:

Well that's great news for hospitals and police stations on a Friday and Saturday night then. :facepalm: This has to be the government's biggest mistake since they were in power. I don't drink but sometimes go out on Friday and Saturday nights and see people behaving like complete twats after a few too many sherbets.

This was a chance for David Cameron to send out a strong message that alcohol kills and is a blight on Britain but completely lost his nerve on this one.

Spineless fool.
 


Meade's Ball

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
13,612
Hither (sometimes Thither)
Is it even possible to drink 3 bottles of vodka a day, and sustain that amount? I would be dead in a month, and I love a drink.

Tescos have their inappropriate Everyday range, don't they, for bargain products. Every time i happen to pass the booze section and see a shelf of Everyday Gin, i think it's a little wrong.

Yesterday, in Tescos, they had a sign up in the frozen section about how they've recognised the need to not line sausages with pigeon scrotums and tell us, the customer, exactly what is inside each of their products. It said in big letters BECAUSE WE LISTEN. I crossed out the listen and scribbled on GOT CAUGHT and today it was no longer there. I mostly wrote that because they'd put that sign on top of the meatfree freezer and it seemed just stupid to tell me, a vegetarian of their slaughterhouse failings. If, however, in the quorn chicken burgers they'd actually been using quorn bat extract without me knowing, i'd be incensed, and demand that sign back.
 


happypig

Staring at the rude boys
May 23, 2009
7,974
Eastbourne
The trouble with minimum pricing is that it isn't a "silver bullet" that will cure all problems because there are a whole raft of problems associated with alcohol; health, public order, crime etc.
We need to look at why a significant number of ordinary people drink a lot at home, we need to look at how we deal with street drinkers, we need to consider if the current way of dealing with anti-social behaviour is working (a lot of ASB is alcohol related).
We have developed, over a few centuries into a drinking culture and to suggest that making supermarkets charge more for booze is going to make all the problems go away is very simplistic.
My solution, and I know it wouldn't find favour with many is that only pubs are allowed to sell alcohol, for drinking there and for take away. I'd also couple it with a far more robust approach to selling drink to people who are already pissed; in the last few years I've seen countless people charged with offences committed when drunk but I've only seen one publican in the dock and that was for allowing a 17yo to buy a drink.
 


Benson

Member
Jan 31, 2012
685
near water
A colleague of mine dealt with a bloke last week who was drinking screenwash, so yes, yes they would.

Sorry Edna, No they wouldn't. An alcoholic would rarely buy that product. No hit, No use. One pound? Mmm, source the strong cider! It's not about the buying of it, it's about the consumption of the drug. He wouldn't have gone to Halfords for his fix, (meths has a better track record for relief, so B&Q maybe?) Anything he could get his hands on.

If the minimum price does rise then alchoholics of the minute would just drink the next cheapest thing.
Me, how do i know? 60+ units per day, every day. Detox. Dry for 14 weeks (****, **** ****!). Gave in.

It has to be a slow change in drinking culture which wont be felt for decades. It needs doing though.

Remember when the sunday drinking culture was much derided by some? i'm not sure that the answer of 'cafe culture' and allday drinking was really the right idea in hindsight.

Soz, i'm ranting, and as a desperate lush (receiving help), I would buy any kind of drink regardless of the price.
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,322
A colleague of mine dealt with a bloke last week who was drinking screenwash, so yes, yes they would.

maybe you missed the 2% on the can?

someone today pointed out there is already minimum pricing - excise duty. its based on the alcohol content. works out about 55p on a 5% pint.
 


HovaGirl

I'll try a breakfast pie
Jul 16, 2009
3,139
West Hove
Paul Gascoigne tried to get drunk on Calpol because he thought it had alcohol in it. So, for those after cheap booze, yes they might drink that stuff.
 




clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,347
Don't think it will affect anything, but it's incredibly easy to get hammered these days for next to nothing.

I bought a couple of those pure mixed Whisky and Ginger things from M and S a while back for a change. A couple of those and I was quite merry.

But it did make me think- they are under £3 quid.

No wonder so many young adults are "pre loading" these days. I see it all the time in London and I'm sure you do in Brighton. Youngsters sh** faced before they go out to save money.

Problem is out in the club when you are already drunk, you probably care less about the money and have a few too many drinks.

So (and here is the controversial bit) I think its the expensive alcohol in pubs and clubs that has created the market and demand for cheap alcohol.

I don't blame the trade, it's the high taxation of alcohol that has paradoxically prompted the big supermarkets to sell it at cost or below.

Bought a few bottles of one of favourite win at ASDA at Christmas. They must have been making a loss or no profit at all.

Controversially again, I don't think any supermarket in a dominant market position should be allowed to sell anything at a loss.

Saves us money ? Rubbish. They are just getting the money back ripping us off in other areas. The price of veg is shocking in supermarkets.

As I get off my high horse, I shop in them all the time and am lucky to have all the big ones within walking distance. Gives me the ability to go to Tesco for instance and get a large rump joint at half price and avoid their veg which is cheaper in Sainsburys. I also shop a lot in ALDI because I'm lucky enough to have two in the area.
 
Last edited:


Foolg

.
Apr 23, 2007
5,024
No wonder so many young adults are "pre loading" these days. I see it all the time in London and I'm sure you do in Brighton. Youngsters sh** faced before they go out to save money.

Problem is out in the club when you are already drunk, you probably care less about the money and have a few too many drinks.

So (and here is the controversial bit) I think its the expensive alcohol in pubs and clubs that has created the market and demand for cheap alcohol.

You're spot on.

As a student, 'pre-drinking' is the norm in order to save a bit of cash. If I buy 6 cans of fosters, it costs me £5 in my local off license, whereas 6 pints would cost me near enough twenty quid. However in my case it's often not just about the cost. I can go out here and get dirt cheap (80p) drinks some nights of the week, but its the idea of standing in a queue for 10 or 15 minutes that puts me off. Sometimes it is just about having a few drinks with some mates before going out, it's hard to have a proper conversation whilst in a nightclub with a few hundred others.

I do agree that it wouldn't change anything though. Students drink A LOT, but I can't see another 20 pence or so on standard lagers changing anything. The only people that really buy the sort of stuff aforementioned, like the Tesco value Beers, the White lightning and so on, are the full blown alcoholics. When somebodies addicted to a substance that bad, I dont think a small increase in price will curbe their consumption, it'll simply bring in more revenue for the government.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
59,659
The Fatherland




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
59,659
The Fatherland
This minimum price thing is one of the most absurd and illogical government ideas I have ever heard. It will not control alcohol intake any more than ever increasing tax on fags controls smoking or outlawing drugs stops people rolling a spliff. It's a lazy token effort at best and a cynical new revenue stream at worst.
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Well that's great news for hospitals and police stations on a Friday and Saturday night then. :facepalm: This has to be the government's biggest mistake since they were in power. I don't drink but sometimes go out on Friday and Saturday nights and see people behaving like complete twats after a few too many sherbets.

This was a chance for David Cameron to send out a strong message that alcohol kills and is a blight on Britain but completely lost his nerve on this one.

Spineless fool.

You dont day ... !!!

Well I do and I too sometimes go out on a Friday night, usually consume more units that some transient body has designated that is good for me.

Just like the vast majority of like minded people and I laugh till my sides split, bond with friends and colleagues reaffirm friendships and then toddle home without disrespecting the police, without log jamming the A&E department.

I do not know if you are a 'sick quitter' when it comes to alcohol, but you have a very narrow minded view of the responsible drinker, if in fact you recognise any responsible consumer of alcohol is valid.

So you just as this body of doctors should not impact on my life choices, give me the facts and allow us educated, sensible adults to make a considered judgement, without imposed sanctions.
 






Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
59,659
The Fatherland
But it would help, just as people have cut down on smoking because they can't afford it.

I'm not convinced. As with most things I prefer to educate rather than legislate i.e. allow people to make informed decisions and have a program to help those who have problems. I appreciate this is very theoretical and it will take a huge huge cultural change, not to mention a few generations, to reduce the current situation but the UK has to start somewhere. Jacking up the prices is not really addressing the root cause is it?
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
59,659
The Fatherland
You dont day ... !!!

Well I do and I too sometimes go out on a Friday night, usually consume more units that some transient body has designated that is good for me.

Just like the vast majority of like minded people and I laugh till my sides split, bond with friends and colleagues reaffirm friendships and then toddle home without disrespecting the police, without log jamming the A&E department.

I do not know if you are a 'sick quitter' when it comes to alcohol, but you have a very narrow minded view of the responsible drinker, if in fact you recognise any responsible consumer of alcohol is valid.

So you just as this body of doctors should not impact on my life choices, give me the facts and allow us educated, sensible adults to make a considered judgement, without imposed sanctions.

I'm really struggling to reconcile this response with Durston's post. Do you think you have been a bit OTT?
 


Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
21,045
The arse end of Hangleton
But it would help, just as people have cut down on smoking because they can't afford it.

I disagree - the hike in cigarette prices has only stopped light and casual smokers. Heavy smokers still smoke. The same will probably happen if they increase the price of alcohol. Those that they really want to cut down will just sacrifice other things such as food to buy the more expensive drink. As usual the only solution our inept politicians can come up with is either taxation or banning - neither work yet idiots in Whitehall persist.
 




Bevendean Hillbilly

New member
Sep 4, 2006
12,805
Nestling in green nowhere
A colleague of mine dealt with a bloke last week who was drinking screenwash, so yes, yes they would.

Your inspectors need a good talking to...or is it that the coffee in the canteen has got really bad since the cuts?
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone
Something needs to be done about the levels of alcohol consumption in this country, especially in teenagers, but slapping more tax on Alcohol, is a lazy and very convenient way for the government to raise even more revenue on a already over burdened general public.
It's not a tax. The government wouldn't get a penny from it.

Well that's great news for hospitals and police stations on a Friday and Saturday night then. :facepalm: This has to be the government's biggest mistake since they were in power. I don't drink but sometimes go out on Friday and Saturday nights and see people behaving like complete twats after a few too many sherbets.
I'm not sure it would have effected the group out on a Friday/Saturday, as any drink bought in a pub etc wouldn't be effected - it's only cheap drinks in the supermarket that would be effected.

The trouble with minimum pricing is that it isn't a "silver bullet" that will cure all problems because there are a whole raft of problems associated with alcohol; health, public order, crime etc.
Of course it wouldn't cure all problems. It wouldn't even cure most problems. But if it cured some problems, that would be a good thing.

My solution, and I know it wouldn't find favour with many is that only pubs are allowed to sell alcohol, for drinking there and for take away.
:lol:

If the minimum price does rise then alchoholics of the minute would just drink the next cheapest thing.
But what about those that are already buying the cheapest thing - could it reduce the amount they drink? And this idea wasn't solely to help alcoholics, it was to reduce the amount that young people (with small amounts of money) binge drink.

Me, how do i know? 60+ units per day, every day. Detox. Dry for 14 weeks (****, **** ****!). Gave in.
Ouch. Good luck.

This minimum price thing is one of the most absurd and illogical government ideas I have ever heard. It will not control alcohol intake any more than ever increasing tax on fags controls smoking or outlawing drugs stops people rolling a spliff. It's a lazy token effort at best and a cynical new revenue stream at worst.
But increasing the price of cigarettes has reduced the amount that people smoke - it has worked. And it's not a new revenue stream is it, because it's not a tax. Not that you'd care about the facts, you just want to bash anything the tory's do (fun for a bit, but it gets boring quickly).

I'm not convinced. As with most things I prefer to educate rather than legislate
...
Jacking up the prices is not really addressing the root cause is it?
Of course you're right there, education is better, but education isn't enough on it's own. Cigarettes are the best example - everyone knows smoking is bad for you (while small amounts of alcohol are not bad for you), but people still do it. Education will not stop them, and price increases will not stop all of them, but it has helped.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here