Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 74,133
He didn't spend £150m on an attempted takeover did he? He had £150m invested in Debenhams, and it looks like he's lost that, as the business has failed.Mike Ashley Blows £150 Mil On Failed Debenhams Takeover
He didn't spend £150m on an attempted takeover did he? He had £150m invested in Debenhams, and it looks like he's lost that, as the business has failed.
They could've bought Eden Hazard for that.
He didn't spend £150m on an attempted takeover did he? He had £150m invested in Debenhams, and it looks like he's lost that, as the business has failed.
I guess. It's just that the headline looked like he'd spent £150m trying to take over, which isn't what's happened.Strictly speaking weren't the shares in Debenhams held by Sports Direct, so the loss is one for Sports Direct rather than Mike Ashley personally
I really don't understand what people have against him.
I really don't understand what people have against him.
I guess. It's just that the headline looked like he'd spent £150m trying to take over, which isn't what's happened.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47858784I really don't know why I'm posting this, but he hadn't built a large stake in Debenhams PLC just for fun, he was clearly doing to to manoeuvre himself into a position to take control.
I really don't know why I'm posting this, but he hadn't built a large stake in Debenhams PLC just for fun, he was clearly doing to to manoeuvre himself into a position to take control.
Fair enough - I figured he had invested in the company before (to make money, rather than either for fun or purely to take control of it), and looked at the recent move as one to take control of it, but I can see how you'd call the whole event as an attempt to take it over.he hadn't built a large stake in Debenhams PLC just for fun, he was clearly doing to to manoeuvre himself into a position to take control.