Ken Loach in pretentious tosser shocker!

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
10,206
The UK Film Council did support

Man On Wire
In The Loop
Adulthood
This is England
Touching the Void
Happy-go-lluck
 




The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
I think this ignores the fact that many of these films were backed by ( at least some) people that wanted a return on their money. Many of these films would have cost peanuts to make and therefore needed relatively samll audiences to break even, so despite not being blockbusters would have provided a return for the backers.

Indeed. Most of them were supported by BBC Films or Film Four. Both of these are commercial funds.

Fair points, but my original contention stands. Cameron has said the UK should concentrate on 'blockbusters'. Why?

It's not such a big leap from what he actually said to inferring that he only wants films made that make money, and as has been proven time and again, doing so is quite often done as the cost of artistic merit.

My other point is - who is he to tell directors what films to make? Who is he to make a judgement call on what it is 'people want to see'?
 


keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
10,206
I don't get this knocking of Ken Loach. As far I can see, he does make films that people want to watch; Wind that Shakes the Barley took $23 worldwide, Looking for Eric took $11m (and that must have cost peanuts to make). Surely profitable films like these are exactly the sort of thing that the public sector should be funding - we'll get some return on them.

QUOTE]

No we need to follow's Cameron's brilliant plan. Just make films based on the biggest selling children's book of all time. There must be loads of those. Oh!
 








e77

Well-known member
May 23, 2004
7,296
Worthing
In any art form you need the pioneers to innovate, which goes on to feed the mainstream in time.

In music hip-hop and electronica were seen as fads in their time and are both now firmly in the mainstream.
 


Hatterlovesbrighton

something clever
Jul 28, 2003
4,543
Not Luton! Thank God
Fair points, but my original contention stands. Cameron has said the UK should concentrate on 'blockbusters'. Why?

It's not such a big leap from what he actually said to inferring that he only wants films made that make money, and as has been proven time and again, doing so is quite often done as the cost of artistic merit.

My other point is - who is he to tell directors what films to make? Who is he to make a judgement call on what it is 'people want to see'?

"It's not such a big leap" - So you're going to imagine that he said it and then crucify him for it??

If you read the context of the question is was about how the UK Government supports film-makers (they currently get a pretty generous tax break), so I would say he has every right to express an opinion. Directors are of course welcome to ignore this as I suspect many will.
 


e77

Well-known member
May 23, 2004
7,296
Worthing
A lot of the problem for independent cinema in this country is distribution. Skeletons and The Scouting Book For Boys were both great films but I had to wait for them to appear on DVD to see them.
 




The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
"It's not such a big leap" - So you're going to imagine that he said it and then crucify him for it??

Well, you might want to take your hero's comment at face value. But, for me, this is a politician talking, and therefore virtually any opinion he (or any other politician) offers is going to be a loaded one.

I'm simply inferring from his comment that he only wants British films to be made that make money, and I don't think that's such a wild inference to make.
 










Castello

Castello
May 28, 2009
432
Tottenham
Lets be honest about this, if Cameron, and by extension the bushy's of this world, had their way, this country would be populated by brain dead automatons who didnt think for themselves, didnt argue, didnt hold an opposing view and just automatically followed the vote Tory signs to the polling stations. This of course would be after working a 12 hour day for a sack of spuds.

If anyone thinks i'm being over the top here, there was a very good 3 part documentary called "The Trap" by Adam Curtis shown on the ultra leftist BBC in 2007, which explained how the post war social policy by parties of both sides in britain and america had been based on the concept of creating a docile an drugged up electorate, that would do what they were told and stop thinking for themselves.

Does anyone truly think politicians wouldnt love this.
 


Albumen

Don't wait for me!
Jan 19, 2010
11,523
Brighton - In your face
The Film Council definitely wasn't perfect and needed reviewing but I wouldn't trust the Tories to make me a decent sandwich let alone have them dictate what films should be made.
 




bhaexpress

New member
Jul 7, 2003
27,627
Kent
It's a bit ironic when you think how many Hollywood blockbusters are actually made in UK studios.
 


gripper stebson

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2004
6,706
I am currently writing a feature script that is supposed to go into production next year for around £600,000... and it's pretty mainstream (funny though I hope!)

I know everyone involved expects to make a bit back. I only get paid if it goes into production... and not alot then.

Having just got involved in this business the thing that amazes me is that you can get this sort of funding with a poster and a star attached... no script needed.

I saw a poster for a film called 'Cockneys Versus Zombies' with a picture of Danny Dyer on it. That is all they were using to raise funds.

Incredible really.
 


Cameron is like a Roman emperor who wants to keep the plebs amused by giving us bread and circuses.

Not good enough. We demand cake and pornographic ice spectaculars. And art films.
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top