Judge quashes control orders.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



A senior judge has quashed control orders made against six men under the Government's anti-terrorist legislation.

Mr Justice Sullivan, sitting at the High Court in London, said the orders were "incompatible" with Article 5 of the European Convention on Human rights.

The article prevents indefinite detention of suspected terrorists without trial.

He ruled: "It follows that the (Home Secretary) had no power to make the orders and they must therefore all be quashed."

The six men, believed to be one British citizen and five Iraqis, had been placed under severe restrictions of liberty in line with the control orders.

The latest decision means the Government has now suffered a High Court "double whammy" in its attempts to legislate to fight terror.

In April the same judge also found the 2005 Prevention of Terrorism Act - under which control orders are made - "incompatible" with the European Convention on Human Rights because "controlees" had not received a fair hearing.

Both cases are now expected to come before the Court of Appeal.
.................................................................................................


The liberal lefties on here will say it’s only fair and they have rights, etc, just like the Judge said in his findings today.

It’s obviously clear they are a danger to the general public with such orders but are free to roam the streets, I feel more uneasy as every day goes by under this dictatorship, incompetent government.

Eriksson should go for Prime minister after he’s finished with England, well, he couldn’t do any worse than this present shower of useless twats.
 
Last edited:




dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
Roll on the new season.
 


The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
You really are thick, aren't you? Have you been given your latest brain-washing by the Hitler Youth again, spewing out the latest thing you ar TOLD to say, irrespective of the fact you have no f***ing idea what you are on about.

It's perfectly simple, dickhead. You are in favour of locking these men up, so are the Labour government. But you are SO STUPID that you find yourself arguing against the people you agree with. Which is just about typical of you, you f***ing idiot.

It's the JUDGE you disagree with, and he is not a politician, nor was his appointment political.

You useless twat.
 




The Large One said:
It's perfectly simple, dickhead. You are in favour of locking these men up, so are the Labour government

I'm all in favour of locking these men up and deporting the undesirables.

Labour brought in the human rights act in 98 because of Tony dictator Blair’s wife Cherie, she's earning a fortune defending this evil so cut the crap about Labour wanting to lock them up, it's all hot air.

While Labour are in power then many more will walk and we'll be a magnet for terrorists, 'FACT'
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top