Well?
Woodchip said:It's a bit like the question "Is a gun dangerous?"
Your average simpleton might find "terrorists" an amusing name for Bradford, but I think you'll find the reason people don't rise to it is that it's not worth it. What am I going to achieve by telling anyone who finds that funny that it is fact, base, unfunny, mildy offensive and pointless?Les Biehn said:What worries me is when people are racist, such as the Crowd v Terrorists thread and no one seems arsed at all. I think that some posters are racist but on the whole most aren't. There however seems to be an underlying acceptance of some forms of racism, such as calling asians terrorists.
Simster said:Your average simpleton might find "terrorists" an amusing name for Bradford, but I think you'll find the reason people don't rise to it is that it's not worth it. What am I going to achieve by telling anyone who finds that funny that it is fact, base, unfunny, mildy offensive and pointless?
Simster said:Your average simpleton might find "terrorists" an amusing name for Bradford, but I think you'll find the reason people don't rise to it is that it's not worth it. What am I going to achieve by telling anyone who finds that funny that it is fact, base, unfunny, mildy offensive and pointless?
Simster said:Your average simpleton might find "terrorists" an amusing name for Bradford, but I think you'll find the reason people don't rise to it is that it's not worth it. What am I going to achieve by telling anyone who finds that funny that it is fact, base, unfunny, mildy offensive and pointless?
So you're saying it is racist??Woodchip said:NSC cannot be racist as it is an inanimate object. However some of the users are.
It's a bit like the question "Is a gun dangerous?"
Fence. In part it is, but as a whole it is quite good.Silent Bob said:So you're saying it is racist??
And as I'm sure you won't need reminding, there's no such thing as racism anyway, only "factually incorrect banter". So the whole thing's academic anyway.Chesney Christ said:Some members of the board are racist, some are just thick and stupid, so just spout ignorance. The majority of NSC are neither, fortunately.
Woodchip said:NSC cannot be racist as it is an inanimate object. However some of the users are.
It's a bit like the question "Is a gun dangerous?"
Like a gun?Woodchip said:Fence. In part it is, but as a whole it is quite good.
Chesney Christ said:Some members of the board are racist, some are just thick and stupid,
British Bulldog said:Name names.
British Bulldog said:Name names.