LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Fair enough
i would add that i don't think we would get away with that first half performance on tuesday night against QPR..who will be buoyed by there away win today
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
I don't get it ?
- Thread starter marshy68
- Start date
i would add that i don't think we would get away with that first half performance on tuesday night against QPR..who will be buoyed by there away win today
DarrenFreemansPerm
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Come on [MENTION=12728]Gold[/MENTION]ene Don't just slide in here and give me a thumbs down, at least post something
Tend to agree with you. Not sure I understand OG's tactics. I really really want to see more Albion goals ... otherwise a partial refund on my season ticket.
portlock seagull
Why? Why us?
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,199
Before Greer got sent off Reading we're so much the better side. If anything it felt like we were 2 players down when Captain Greer received his marching orders. We just didn't get going. Again. Our positions not bad but it's like a championship mike bailey team at times. We are just boring to watch. Pedestrian, pass pass pass but then awful control, a woeful cross, out muscled or just no idea what to do going forward and the opposition soon have the ball back.
Let's not forget this isn't anything especially new. We've been shot and goal shy for many games over past 3 seasons.
Let's not forget this isn't anything especially new. We've been shot and goal shy for many games over past 3 seasons.
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
We were woeful throughout. Reading moved the ball with far more purpose and tho I've not looked up the stats Reading must easily have had a couple of dozen shots off target. If they could have hit a cow's arse with a banjo the score would have been about 5-1 as a minimum. Just won't do.
That is exactly how I saw it
This sums it up perfectly. Tedious is the word I use.
Guy Fawkes
The voice of treason
- Sep 29, 2007
- 8,212
Crosses were poor or a lack of bodies in the box to get on the end of the crosses? (which has been a recurring theme this entire season and may be due to our most attack minded players like Orlandi and Buckley suffering from injuries for most of it)
midnight_rendezvous
Well-known member
Bit of both. Dave's delivery in to the box today was pretty lacklustre, often over hit or no one on the end of them.
Would you say Arsenal are a defensive team then?
TottonSeagull
Well-known member
We were poor last week at Millwall and this was no better today. I am not knocking Oscar and believe he will be a good coach for us but apart from the odd game I am yet to see the passing style of last season with an emphasis on more attacking as we told we would be getting at the beginning of the season. Today was another example of a lack of pace in the team (except Lingard). With no outlet we result to hopeful long balls to Leo and therefore handing possession back to Reading. I can't remember once getting behind their full backs.
To be honest I would have preferred it if Oscar had started 2 of Buckley, March and Lua Lua and we had lost having a real go at attacking football. Finding it all a bit George Graham at the moment!
To be honest I would have preferred it if Oscar had started 2 of Buckley, March and Lua Lua and we had lost having a real go at attacking football. Finding it all a bit George Graham at the moment!
StanmoreSeagull
Member
Simply put... If we don't start with pace on the wings we are poor. Still don't get how the management don't see that! So frustrating!
I actually got to the match today, which is a rare treat.
A strange game. It actually had everything that you could wish for in terms of entertainment. Comedy own goal, disallowed goal, bizarre corner incident, sending off, instant hate figure for the crowd to get onto, backs to the wall tension etc.
However, if I'm honest, I would have to say that I was disappointed with the attacking threat that we posed. We made almost nothing with 11 men on the pitch and owed our lead to the opposition. Oddly, we seemed a little more lively in the second half with ten men. Buckley looked sharp and only a cracking save by the keeper kept out his effort in injury time.
Disappointed in the ref. Ulloa had players scything through the back of him all afternoon and got nothing. Elbows flying and all sorts.
For all of those that like a binfest though, consider this. I spent seven years abroad and when I finally got back for a game my first match was the defeat against the 9 men of Walsall in Withdean. We really have come SO far since then. We may nt get promotion but we are a solid team with a solid ground and solid support. Happy days.
A strange game. It actually had everything that you could wish for in terms of entertainment. Comedy own goal, disallowed goal, bizarre corner incident, sending off, instant hate figure for the crowd to get onto, backs to the wall tension etc.
However, if I'm honest, I would have to say that I was disappointed with the attacking threat that we posed. We made almost nothing with 11 men on the pitch and owed our lead to the opposition. Oddly, we seemed a little more lively in the second half with ten men. Buckley looked sharp and only a cracking save by the keeper kept out his effort in injury time.
Disappointed in the ref. Ulloa had players scything through the back of him all afternoon and got nothing. Elbows flying and all sorts.
For all of those that like a binfest though, consider this. I spent seven years abroad and when I finally got back for a game my first match was the defeat against the 9 men of Walsall in Withdean. We really have come SO far since then. We may nt get promotion but we are a solid team with a solid ground and solid support. Happy days.
Can't disagree with that. Pace is needed especially at home.
brighton bluenose
Well-known member
We were woeful throughout. Reading moved the ball with far more purpose and tho I've not looked up the stats Reading must easily have had a couple of dozen shots off target. If they could have hit a cow's arse with a banjo the score would have been about 5-1 as a minimum. Just won't do.
According to the BBC Championship website Reading had 27 shots with six on target to our 6 with 1 on target - OK Greer got sent off but overall we were out-played and out-thought!
Teams work us out and despite being unpopular on here Adkins is no mug play high up the pitch, close us down quickly and they will force errors and get chances - fvcken simple!
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
We need a plan B
You are dead right. If you start with a midfield of Lopez Andrews Ince and Forster Caskey and have 3 wingers on the bench then you get what you pay for. Sophisticated Barcelona type passing football? Not quite!!. Long balls pumped up to a centre forward with 2 or 3 defenders grappling with him. Hopeless and boring. Sometimes managers think they are too clever for their own good.
supaseagull
Well-known member
We are fine until we go 1-0 up or we have to chase the game and then our midfield sit far too deep in front of the back four and so there's no outlet for the counter attack.
It's very negative and was exactly the way Arsenal used to play in the early 90s. It was successful then but not now.
It's very negative and was exactly the way Arsenal used to play in the early 90s. It was successful then but not now.
withdeanwombat
Well-known member
We should go back to two fullbacks, two wing halves flanking Roy Jennings, two wingers, two inside forwards and Bill Curry. Dave Hollins in goal. It would be a marvel to behold.
Wellesley
Well-known member
- Jul 24, 2013
- 4,973
Oscar. " My obsession is to attack, to attack the opposition. To keep the ball and have the ball as many times as possible."