Hoskins to Bournemouth - allegedly a fee has been agreed [merged]
- Thread starter blockhseagull
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,249
Got some new Russian (?) owners now. Odd investment really, if you ask me, Bournemouth have always been a club with finite potential, and I can't ever really see them getting much bigger, no matter how much money they chuck at players.
terryberry1
Well-known member
I'm completely sane. If we were offered our money back for CMS I would take it in an instant. Massively over rated imo. I know I am in a minority
LU7 RED
Active member
Hmmm. Still would be suprised if it happened - looks like its up to him.
Agree that Vokes would be a good replacement if it does happen. Being a Bournemouth fan, its still a bit weird buying players. The debate here is whether its money from our co-owner (the ruskie) or just the transfer money we got last year for about 7 players!!
Pretty sure the wage structure has changed though..it must have.
Agree that Vokes would be a good replacement if it does happen. Being a Bournemouth fan, its still a bit weird buying players. The debate here is whether its money from our co-owner (the ruskie) or just the transfer money we got last year for about 7 players!!
Pretty sure the wage structure has changed though..it must have.
dadams2k11
ID10T Error
I'm under the impression that the player has to KNOW before an offer as been accepted for him?
Lush
Mods' Pet
Don't forget that with Hoskins fit and on the bench, Gus chose to put Adgestein on last Saturday.
Still seems a bit short sighted to sell though, unless we need the extra cash for someone else (please not Kitson).
Still seems a bit short sighted to sell though, unless we need the extra cash for someone else (please not Kitson).
Annoying for him, annoying for us. But if we now have Torby as a cheap option, letting Hoskins go and bringing in someone else does make some sort of sense. We won't be able to conclude whether or not it's a good piece of business until we see his replacement. Whatever happens, I'll be sad to see him go as I was really excited about him and I don't think we ever saw what he was capable of.
You most certainly are
Seagull Steve
SWC
Looking at it from that angle it makes a bit better sense, I suppose. But I would definitely prefer him to stay, if we use that money to bring Kitson in. Given half a chance, WH could bang in a few goals in for us. It makes it worse, knowing that we agreed a fee without his knowledge.
LU7 RED
Active member
See my post above..the russian, plus last years spendies from transfers..either one, or a bit of both!
Kumquat
New member
- Mar 2, 2009
- 4,459
I am in 100% agreement with this.
True. But as you say it's very short sighted to decide Hoskins is surplus to requirements based on Adgestein only making a few appearances
Players get sold all the time without them knowing or forced out of their club. They are often last to hear about it. It's nothing new to football.
terryberry1
Well-known member
I know, think he is a very good player. Not a £3.2million player. 1 goal in 20 games justifies what I am saying
Garry Nelson's Left Foot
Well-known member
When did that happen?
gripper stebson
Well-known member
- Jul 27, 2004
- 6,662
Imagine the binfestation if he is not replaced in this window!!!
KNC
Well-known member
When did they become rich?
When the Russians moved in.
When the Russians moved in.
- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,249
Don't know, you'd have to ask the AFCB fan on this thread. Am not really surprised Matt Tubbs (apparently) turned them down at this stage, with his record, you'd have thought he'd get an offer from a bigger or higher placed club. Hard to imagine him leaving Crawley for Bournemouth, though I guess he is from down that way so maybe that'd play a part.
Basil Fawlty
Don't Mention The War
You must be the only one who thinks this.....
deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 21,091
This sums up my thoughts on the matter.