**highlights**

[Mayonaise]

Kayal looks a class apart throughout.

 

[Sheebo]

I am sure these highlights are out of sync or have not been edited properly.

I was at the game and I am sure Hemed, Kayal and March? Sprung the offside trap and converged on Martin's goal PRIOR to Hemed's goal.

They are indeed - 9 plastics above it didn't know cos they weren't at the game

 

[Deleted User X18H]

They are indeed - 9 plastics above it didn't know cos they weren't at the game

I am saying nowt

 

[Sheebo]

I am sorry but Hemed is largely hopeless with his feet unless its a penalty

Nah he's not a great striker of the ball - miss-kicks a lot. He's certainly not hopeless with his feet - his hold up play and touch are premier league quality without doubt.

 

[Sheebo]

I am saying nowt

I couldn't see who their keeper was as they ran out of programmes in 1901 but he fell over a lot!

 

[Skaville]

Kayal looked different class in these highlights

He was. A very clear MOTM

 

[HantsSeagull]

Nah he's not a great striker of the ball - miss-kicks a lot. He's certainly not hopeless with his feet - his hold up play and touch are premier league quality without doubt.

yeah i will give you that - i meant scoring with his feet. that miss was horrendous.

 

[chaileyjem]

Thank **** we have two weeks until the next game and can try to sort the pitch out.

Hemed chance on the break was def the pitch bobbling combined with a shocking miss

it was also offside...

 

[Green Cross Code Man]

it was also offside...

Was it? Hemed was clearly offside, then hung back allowing Kayal and another player to rush through. When the ball was played to Hemed, he was behind Kayal.

 

[Sheebo]

yeah i will give you that - i meant scoring with his feet. that miss was horrendous.

Yep that's def his weak point - converting chances with feet. With his head he's very good. Hold up play exceptional. Unfortunately Murray can finish with his feet well as well as his head! I feel for Tomer as he's a good player. I can still see him being a key sub next season even if we go up.

 

[Sheebo]

it was also offside...

Was it? Hemed was clearly offside, then hung back allowing Kayal and another player to rush through. When the ball was played to Hemed, he was behind Kayal.

Don't think it was. Kayal's leg is in front of Tomer and the defender is level or slightly in front - def not off.

 

[Easy 10]

Regardless of where the defender was, he can't be offside, he was behind the ball.

 

[Bozza]

Regardless of whether he was offside or not, given or not, he missed.

 

[Prince Monolulu]

He missed, offside or not. We won.

 

[Sheebo]

He missed, offside or not. We won.

Was just answering an earlier post

Yes [MENTION=70]Easy 10[/MENTION] is correct he's behind the ball. I couldn't remember if it was the ball or our player that matters - maybe the position of our player doesn't matter then.

 

[tigertim68]

it was also offside...

No it wasn't , no flag and would of counted. ,a bad miss

 

[Jimmy Grimble]

It was a bad miss but it did bobble slightly before he hit it.

 

[Bozza]

What IS remarkable is that Hemed is on 10 goals this season (including 3, I think, for Israel) when it feels like he's barely had a game.

Last season he scored 19 (including 2, I think, for Israel).

It's not inconceivable that he'll beat last year's total.

 

[c0lz]

BBC Match of the day - Brighton vs Mk-Dons FA Cup Highlights

 

[Green Cross Code Man]

Don't think it was. Kayal's leg is in front of Tomer and the defender is level or slightly in front - def not off.

View attachment 80942

Yes, I agree, my point was that initially, Hemed was in an offside position but then held back. When the pass was made he was onside.