severnside gull
Well-known member
No they won't - both have long term contracts - stop shit stirring for the sake of it
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Grant Hall
- Thread starter AZ Gull
- Start date
No they won't - both have long term contracts - stop shit stirring for the sake of it
pornomagboy
wake me up before you gogo who needs potter when
It says on back of argus that we are waiting on a fee from spurs
severnside gull
Well-known member
Just chatting on the phone to a friend who has links to Bristol City. He says that they have missed out on a loan bid for Elliot Ward from Norwich (checks out on SSN or I wouldn't be posting) so have gone back to Spurs for Grant Hall
albion534
Well-known member
Just out of interest, can a player be loaned out if the compo is still undecided?
severnside gull
Well-known member
I guess it would be okay unless we objected.
To be honest if he does well on loan it would increase his value so my guess would be that it is in Spurs interest to do a deal quickly.
As declaring fees seems to have become unfashionable these days it wouldn't surprise me if a deal had been done and simply not announced
Arthur
Well-known member
So what happened with this fella?
Did he sign for Spurs?
Has he played?
Did we get any cash?
Did he sign for Spurs?
Has he played?
Did we get any cash?
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
At Spurs
Yes
Professionals Profiles - Team - tottenhamhotspur.com
Don't think so
Still at the tribunal.
Nathan
Well-known member
- Jan 8, 2010
- 3,811
Arthur
Well-known member
Danker!
If it's a pitiful amount can we go into melt down like Palace fans do every time they sell one of their "world beaters".........despite the fact the bloke only played 30 seconds of first team football
Taybha
Whalewhine
Spurs will no doubt claim he is nothing more than the tea boy , we will get £30k rising to £50k when he makes 100 full cups , then sell him to man city for 6 million
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
Obviously I wish him the best of luck. Hope he gets some first team games. I thought it was a strange decision why he went. I can only think the money was a lot better.
Last edited by a moderator:
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
Just found this if not already posted. We are due 1.5 million.
Tottenham transfer news: Stoke pulled out Huddlestone loan deal over Spurs demands - Mirror Online
Tottenham transfer news: Stoke pulled out Huddlestone loan deal over Spurs demands - Mirror Online
Greg Bobkin
Silver Seagull
- May 22, 2012
- 17,963
Didn't he get loaned out somewhere straight away?
If thats true, SPURS have been MUGGED. I would of been happy with 500,000 - 800,000.
- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,808
Shades of Ken Dodd. Does anyone remember from his radio shows many year ago "Where's me shirt It's twenty-five past five and Im a shirt short."
The Large One
Who's Next?
Fair's fair. It was 246 minutes.
Arthur
Well-known member
Firstly, you sad git working that out!
Secondly, if we get anything at all for the lad then surely that is good business? How can someone who has played 246 minutes of professional football be worth 1.5m? Have we got the same bloke Palace have doing our valuations?
The Large One
Who's Next?
Can't argue with that.
Gareth Barry netted us a round million, and he never played for us at all. It would have been more, but the Albion needed the cash, so they settled on a round figure.
I guess it's down to a valuation the buying club makes on a player against the amount of time, effort and money the original club put in to get that player to a given standard. I'm note sure it's a transfer fee as such, as he has no contract (though we offered him three years) - it's more compensation for that work (in this instance, we're talking about what - five or six years' worth?) the club put in before Spurs came in and cherry-picked him.
I think that was the reasoning behind Gareth Barry's transfer - and the Grant Hall scenario does seem similar.
Though how a specific figure of £1.5m is arrived at - Gawd knows.