I don't know who took this, but it's everywhere.
This is Sky Sports Italia. You can prob translate the caption...
This is Sky Sports Italia. You can prob translate the caption...
No, not movement, though that was my first thought. It's been my hobby for 40 years, so I've used many different lenses, but this is twice as long as anything I've previously used. I've got plenty of with and without shots, and the difference is clear. This was from the same spot in my garden a few days ago:That looks like movement rather than blur?!
I love, love, LOVE the 100-400mm btw. Not my sharpist lens, but incredible range in such a small body.
I had a similar issue with a polarizer on a Minolta 80-200. It wasn't motion because I tried with a tripod as well. Everything seemed slightly out of focus with the polarizer, but in focus without, and also in focus on manual. I wondered if the filter somehow affected the AF readings, but I don't know how.Any preferences on here here for using / not using a UV filter on your lens at all times? I've always put one on for protection, so when I noticed a mark (luckily, only a splash) on my brilliant new Canon RF 100-400m glass, I bought an admittedly cheap filter.
It was awful on the long zoom - the camera is a Canon R7 with an APS-C sensor, so we're talking about a 640mm equivalent. I've attached with/without pix for comparison, will send the filter back and do without. I suspect any filter would degrade the image quality at that magnification, but I'm surprised how much.
In hindsight, I had a similar problem with another lens about 10 years ago, and I’m now wondering if that was also the filter!I had a similar issue with a polarizer on a Minolta 80-200. It wasn't motion because I tried with a tripod as well. Everything seemed slightly out of focus with the polarizer, but in focus without, and also in focus on manual. I wondered if the filter somehow affected the AF readings, but I don't know how.
Something confusing to me here is that sites with info on sea level rise don't have anything like the amount of increase you suggest. The UK govt site for instance suggests a rise of 3mm per year currently. I love the photo btw!Aberystwyth just after high tide beachfront old mooring pontoon
Who'd of thunked sea levels would rise by so much in 25 years,this will be a photo of water within the next 10 years
View attachment 198199
Taught me something, I work for Swale Academy. Didin't realise it was a river, just thought it was an area council. Great picture!
Wow, those allotments right by Dundee's ground!Some photos from a weekend of Scottish football.
Friday night was Raith Rovers v Dunfermline, Saturday was Hearts v Ross County and Sunday was Dundee United v Dundee.
A special shout out to our very own @albionalba who I messaged via NSC after I spotted that he is based in Dundee.
In a display of true NSC kindness I was met at the station, taken on a tour of Dundee, a bite for lunch and dropped off outside the ground.
All followed by a cracking local derby won be the away side underdogs Dundee, 4-2 against their rivals Dundee United.
NSC at its best, thank you Paul!
See you at The Amex soon.
https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjC62pb
(Sony RX100 mk7)