Full national lockdown (not education) 4/11 - 1/12 possible

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Probably not a popular post but a practical one.

We have a population in the UK almost 70 million.

Most people dying of COVID are 80 years plus.

If we had a million deaths would it really make a difference to our country/economy as opposed to lockdowns which are clearly ****ing the working lives and GDP of the UK, not to mention the effect it is taking our collective mental health?

Would you think like that if you worked in an NHS hospital do you think? How fecked up are the staff going to be dealing with overflowing Covid wards?
 




sparkie

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
12,586
Hove
Probably not a popular post but a practical one.

We have a population in the UK almost 70 million.

Most people dying of COVID are 80 years plus.

If we had a million deaths would it really make a difference
to our country/economy as opposed to lockdowns which are clearly ****ing the working lives and GDP of the UK, not to mention the effect it is taking our collective mental health?

All Lives Matter.
 


Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
34,496
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Probably not a popular post but a practical one.

We have a population in the UK almost 70 million.

Most people dying of COVID are 80 years plus.

If we had a million deaths would it really make a difference to our country/economy as opposed to lockdowns which are clearly ****ing the working lives and GDP of the UK, not to mention the effect it is taking our collective mental health?

Well, if we let it rip to that extent the number of cases could be huge at any one time. So who treats the borderline, keeps the economy ticking and buries the huge increase in the numbers of dead?
 


keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,701
Probably not a popular post but a practical one.

We have a population in the UK almost 70 million.

Most people dying of COVID are 80 years plus.

If we had a million deaths would it really make a difference to our country/economy as opposed to lockdowns which are clearly ****ing the working lives and GDP of the UK, not to mention the effect it is taking our collective mental health?

I reckon a million people dying might have an affect on our collective mental health.
 


Poojah

Well-known member
Nov 19, 2010
1,881
Leeds
I read it much more as a roadmap out of here, but it is the opinion of "some scientists" and the opinions journalists choose for these pieces are never going to be the bland ones that wouldn't make a story.

I'm afraid that, for me, it contains a lot of common sense. Covid is now endemic. Flu has never gone. Colds have never gone.

One of my mum's friends is a virologist who spent a lot of time at Uni studying pandemics and worked for GSK for years. She thinks that it's possible the current cold virus started out life as something similar to Covid and weakened over time. I think in one form or another it's here to stay forever.

The questions then become how do you deal with it and how good, really, are the vaccines. I can certainly see this lasting for several years with summers being "good times" and winters being pretty harsh. Certainly, if anyone thinks that Euro 2021 will be taking place across Europe with full crowds in the summer, vaccine or no vaccine, then they are stark, staring mad. It will have to move to a single country with BCD or restricted, socially distanced crowds and no away fans. Maybe now people will start to see why football is moving to a PPV model - we may not be back in a 30,000 Amex for a few seasons.

The alternative view is, of course, that no one knows for certain what will happen over the next 5 years, We are much better at science and technology now than in the past. Vaccines by themselves are certainly not a magic bullet but if we can combine a "good" vaccine with improvements in treatment of both acute and long covid and "instant" (let's say 30 minute or less) testing results then we will be very much more normal fairly soon.

And don't think any of that fills me with glee. As well as taking elderly relatives from us what this virus has done is effectively killed fun and culture. Sport, gigs, festivals and the theatre. With the exception of eating out those four things WERE my social life, so I find the above depresssing and stark. But we do need to be realistic, because that puts focus on those three medical things that could restore "normality" sooner.

The alternative, of course, is to just let it rip and carry on regardless. There are those on here who think that's the best strategy. Presumably they don't have beloved elderly relatives or know anyone working in the NHS.

You may be right, but I definitely find that assessment hard to swallow. A line in that article suggested that some form of social distancing may have to be a thing for ‘decades’. I mean, I’m mid-thirties and I don’t know how long I’m going to live, but that’s almost tantamount to saying that my life as I knew it is over.

And that’s thoroughly depressing.
 




jakarta

Well-known member
May 25, 2007
15,640
Sullington
I reckon a million people dying might have an affect on our collective mental health.

Not really, I am of the generation that is seeing all my elderly relatives go so I am not sentimental about it.

If you are 80 plus you have had your innings, or do you think people should live forever?
 


A mex eyecan

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2011
3,356
Not really, I am of the generation that is seeing all my elderly relatives go so I am not sentimental about it.

If you are 80 plus you have had your innings, or do you think people should live forever?

if I’m following you correctly ....

let’s let all the old un’s die, just as long as everyone else go carry on regardless?
 


franks brother

Well-known member
It must be a devastating truth for all Tory supporters. Boris Johnson has not learnt, grown or evolved since beginning of pandemic. He is calamitously failing to manage crisis and keep people out of harm’s way. Rejecting circuit breaker simply because it was suggested by Labour.
 




D

Deleted member 2719

Guest
The devil will be in the detail as to what can stay open but I fail to see how screwing our economy EVEN more than we already have is going to help us in the long run. This is going to push a lot of businesses and a lot of people to the brink.

I do agree with you, but with scientist predicting a crazy amount of deaths, what else can he do.

He really is in a lose-lose situation, because the world is in a lose-lose situation and so many people have been irresponsible.

Kids and grandkids will be picking up the covid bill for years, and ironically they are the ones who don't give a monkey's at the moment.
 


Is it PotG?

Thrifty non-licker
Feb 20, 2017
23,710
Sussex by the Sea
It must be a devastating truth for all Tory supporters. Boris Johnson has not learnt, grown or evolved since beginning of pandemic. He is calamitously failing to manage crisis and keep people out of harm’s way. Rejecting circuit breaker simply because it was suggested by Labour.

Where is your evidence that a 2 week national break would have worked?

School half-terms were staggered all around this time, a load of claptrap.
 






Rodney Thomas

Well-known member
May 2, 2012
1,577
Ελλάδα
If that were the case it would've ripped the the entire student population in a week from one single case at each university, and that's based on the largest university in the country, University College London (41,180 total students)

Day 1. 1 case
Day 2. 6 new cases
Day 3. 36 new cases
Day 4. 216 new cases
Day 5. 1,296 new cases
Day 6. 7,776 new cases
Day 7. 46,656 new cases

Except not all students returned, most lectures were online (with minimal face to face seminars) and freshers / social events / bars were cancelled/socially distanced.

So, yeah, could well have been R:6 at some point. Stats, dont you just love them put of context.
 


Bob!

Coffee Buyer
Jul 5, 2003
11,173
It must be a devastating truth for all Tory supporters. Boris Johnson has not learnt, grown or evolved since beginning of pandemic. He is calamitously failing to manage crisis and keep people out of harm’s way. Rejecting circuit breaker simply because it was suggested by Labour.

It wasn't a suggestion by Labour.

It was a recommendation by SAGE that the Government decided against. It was only when the SAGE minutes were released a couple of weeks after their meeting that Sir Kier Starmer started pushing it.

So they were ignoring SAGE, not Labour.
 


Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
42,862
Lancing
Expectations nothing like 2019 will be seen for at least 5 years, maybe decades with constant in and out lockdowns. There seems absolutely no light at the end of the tunnel
 




Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
42,862
Lancing
If he doesn’t.......and our hospitals are overwhelmed.....what then ? It’s precisely about avoiding people dying in hospital corridors isn’t it ?

Instead of at home ? Where tens of thousands have done so this year already
 


ken tiler

Active member
Nov 24, 2007
324
Brighton
Not sure that's correct - there are two things at play...

- The number of people each person infects (this is R)
- The speed with which that reinfection occurs.

Stuff I've read suggests that most people who develop symptoms do so between 4-6 days after infection, and that people typically start to become infectious a day or two before the onset of symptoms. I'm not sure what this means for those who remain asymptomatic throughout, but it feels like a good guess to suggest they also won't be immediately infectious.

If these are correct (and I'm not going to research that now at twenty past midnight) then no one can infect anyone the day after they became infected themselves as per your model.

I would also think that as soon as you start confining people to their accommodation, an R of 6 would plummet very, very quickly.

Forgive me if this point has already been made but I presume these figures are not really “cases” in fact but merely people who have tested positive for SARS-cov2, and are not necessarily infectious or present with symptoms of COVID-19. The false positive rate for the PCR test is likely to be very high and the resulting r values highly dubious. As a result of the accuracy of the current testing regime, I think instead we should be more worried about the overall all cases excess death rate as it would be a better indicator of something untoward happening. So far, in Brighton and Hove, judging by the figures reported on the NHS data site, and given my caveats about testing, the current Covid related deaths and bed occupancy seems very low. Nationally the figures seem to align with a normal autumn winter rise in respiratory rates. I see no justification for further lockdown measures apart from protecting the vulnerable should they wish. I firmly believe in the measures taken in Sweden and Japan which follow this ethos which is also advocated in the Great Barrington Declaration backed by Epidemiology experts at Oxford, Sussex, and Stanford Universities amongst others.
 


One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
21,793
Worthing
It must be a devastating truth for all Tory supporters. Boris Johnson has not learnt, grown or evolved since beginning of pandemic. He is calamitously failing to manage crisis and keep people out of harm’s way. Rejecting circuit breaker simply because it was suggested by Labour.

Incorrect - SAGE suggested it.

The government would only have been criticised by some for doing it during half-term, resulting in less fortunate families having to stay inside and children suffering.

This is a terrible situation for everyone, the political point scoring is embarrassing at times. I’m sure the government wished they’d approached some aspects differently - in fact they should have IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,927
Well, if we let it rip to that extent the number of cases could be huge at any one time. So who treats the borderline, keeps the economy ticking and buries the huge increase in the numbers of dead?
Dead people don't spend money either.
 




The Merry Prankster

Pactum serva
Aug 19, 2006
5,577
Shoreham Beach
Loaded question maybe but why are universities open? Can't everything (except partying and mass gathering) be done over video conference?

Libraries were more important when I was at uni but these days most things are online.

I don't remember doing much work at uni, it was pretty much one big party!

I'm sure you know the answer to this but it is so that they can demand full fees and get rents from students (student accommodation rent comprising a huge percentage of Uni income). Massively cynical.
 


LlcoolJ

Mama said knock you out.
Oct 14, 2009
12,982
Sheffield
I’m no fan of Johnson at all, but it’s fairly evident he’s a policy taker rather than a policy maker.
The information was "leaked" to The Times and the Fail last night.

Yesterday Raab was on TV telling everyone there was no way they would impose a national lockdown. So someone's chucked him under the bus.

No statement from the PM.

It's pretty bloody obvious that Cummings is in charge and is taking the piss.

I bet Shapps is sent out again tomorrow to deal with Sophy Ridge and Andrew Marr (with a metaphorical "kick me" post it on his back).
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top