free speach

[beorhthelm]

Is it just me or are jodcm's posts so difficult to read. I spent so much time trying to extract the sentences I lost the point of the post.

indeed, and very similar in style to another poster...

 

[jodcm007]

indeed, and very similar in style to another poster...

And who would that be

 

[looney]

The point is that what you wrote could be interpreted as incitement to racial hatred which is illegal and could get NSC closed down. Whether you agree with that interpretation or not is not the point, legally it's like harassment or bullying, it doesn't matter if the intention was to incite hatred or not it's the perception of it by those who feel threatened by it.

Thats bullshit. The legal definision is how a reasonable man would respond. This excludes political types jacked up on Political correctness.

Free speach is more to do with the freedom to be heard than speak.

 

[Hungry Joe]

Thats bullshit. The legal definision is how a reasonable man would respond. This excludes political types jacked up on Political correctness.

Free speach is more to do with the freedom to be heard than speak.

No, the above is bullshit.

 

[looney]

Ha wrong fag, least I gave a definition. If you start going round banning things because some people "perceive" it to be offensive then what are you left with?

Thats why you have organisations like the ASA.

Now seal your Man juicer before you reveal yourself to be even more stupid, dunce.

 

[Hungry Joe]

Ha wrong fag, least I gave a definition. If you start going round banning things because some people "perceive" it to be offensive then what are you left with?

Thats why you have organisations like the ASA.

Now seal your Man juicer before you reveal yourself to be even more stupid, dunce.

Looney, you are an absolute gash. If what you wrote didn't make me laugh so much I may actually take you seriously.

 

[looney]

It makes you laugh because you lack the f***ing frontal lobes to understand and arguement dolt.

The legal definision is how a reasonable man would respond. This excludes political types jacked up on Political correctness.

Spelling aside whats wrong with that shitdick? You have trouble telling the difference between opinion and fact? Just because a tutu wearing perpetually played out pansy like you doesn't like something isn't a reason to re-invent the whole friggin world, putz.

 

[lincs seagull]

Ha wrong fag, least I gave a definition. If you start going round banning things because some people "perceive" it to be offensive then what are you left with?

Thats why you have organisations like the ASA.

Now seal your Man juicer before you reveal yourself to be even more stupid, dunce.

Morning looney good to see you back to your old self.

prefer you def of freedom of speech

it a case of being open minded and ignoring wankers who you dont agree with and then voicing your opion and then getting the majority to side with your views.

not say its wrong because i say so

 

[Hungry Joe]

It makes you laugh because you lack the f***ing frontal lobes to understand and arguement dolt.

The legal definision is how a reasonable man would respond. This excludes political types jacked up on Political correctness.

Spelling aside whats wrong with that shitdick? You have trouble telling the difference between opinion and fact? Just because a tutu wearing perpetually played out pansy like you doesn't like something isn't a reason to re-invent the whole friggin world, putz.

Where in the legal definition does it "exclude political types jacked up on Political correctness?" For your information I hate PC and all it stands for. I also retain the right to be offended by what some other people think is reasonable. I don't find anything you write offensive because it's too stupid to take seriously. It would be so easy for me to lower myself to your gutter level of childish insults by I fear it would give you an erection for a week. Te'ra you sad little man, I can't be bothered to respond to your ramblings anymore.

 

[looney]

Howdy Lincs, I made £80 on your tip about leeds. Thanks.

 

[looney]

You refered to legal terms.

To judge if something is offensive on average takes an Average person to judge, how would a reasonable person respond. Usually termed as the man on the Clapham omnibus.

Hence this excludes, political activists, the mentally ill etc.

Get a f***ing clue.

 

[jodcm007]

It makes you laugh because you lack the f***ing frontal lobes to understand and arguement dolt.

The legal definision is how a reasonable man would respond. This excludes political types jacked up on Political correctness.

Spelling aside whats wrong with that shitdick? You have trouble telling the difference between opinion and fact? Just because a tutu wearing perpetually played out pansy like you doesn't like something isn't a reason to re-invent the whole friggin world, putz.

here here

 

[lincs seagull]

Howdy Lincs, I made £80 on your tip about leeds. Thanks.

Glad to be of service i will let you know of any more predictions

i reckon a win at millwall let you know the score

 

[NMH]

well i thought that what this what about being able to babble on freely but it looks like it cant be done here

I believe you can babble on all you like......about football.

It IS a football site after all, and the mods are entitled to delete ALL non-footy-related gibberings. However, sometimes they don't.

If it's about race that's inflammatory, not relevent to this BHAFC supporter site and nothing to do with footy (unless it's regarding something that Spanish manager said, i.e. racism in football), then why not look elsewhere to debate that sort of stuff?

 

[jodcm007]

I believe you can babble on all you like......about football.

It IS a football site after all, and the mods are entitled to delete ALL non-footy-related gibberings. However, sometimes they don't.

If it's about race that's inflammatory, not relevent to this BHAFC supporter site and nothing to do with footy (unless it's regarding something that Spanish manager said, i.e. racism in football), then why not look elsewhere to debate that sort of stuff?

sorry i never understood that when you go to a match you only speal about football (soccer of course)
i think that you are misssing the point
or maybe its me

 

[Lord Bracknell]

sorry i never understood that when you go to a match you only speal about football (soccer of course)
i think that you are misssing the point
or maybe its me

You're a newcomer here, jodcm007. You need to learn that NSC draws the line somewhere.

Most NSC users won't, for example, be at all tolerant of people who use the word "soccer".

 

[jodcm007]

You're a newcomer here, jodcm007. You need to learn that NSC draws the line somewhere.

Most NSC users won't, for example, be at all tolerant of people who use the word "soccer".

well i never knew what nation he came from
could be american (sounds like one because they dont understand banter either )
im which case it would be soccer
would'nt want it confused with there beautiful game

 

[Lokki 7]

You're a newcomer here, jodcm007. You need to learn that NSC draws the line somewhere.

Most NSC users won't, for example, be at all tolerant of people who use the word "soccer".

 

[WATFORD O]

ok ok but just a thought i would like to see that stats on racial assaults or is that just a white thing oh o forgot arabs arent racist are they go and mod that

you have a point. I dont even believe in racism anyway. Everyone is tribal, black white, rich poor, bha lofc, ginger, blond, fat thin. Its all prejudice. Some people actually use the accusation of 'racsim' to further highlight their tribal prejudices.

 

[jodcm007]

you have a point. I dont even believe in racism anyway. Everyone is tribal, black white, rich poor, bha lofc, ginger, blond, fat thin. Its all prejudice. Some people actually use the accusation of 'racsim' to further highlight their tribal prejudices.

here here well said
theres some on here who think it alright to print someones phone number and address but dont like a heated debate
something very wrong somewhere
me thinks