Do you like the Royal family?

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Do you like the Royal family?

  • Yes. They do so much for this country.

    Votes: 79 72.5%
  • No, I am a lettuce eating lefty.

    Votes: 30 27.5%

  • Total voters
    109








beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,444
Should Britain have any unelected leaders or heads of state in the 21st Century?

do elected leaders always do so well? consider a number of dictators were voted in.

the current royals do their job well, and i can see that continuing for the next generations. the status quo works, leave it as it is.
 




Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
They make far more than they cost raise millions for charity, without the money they bring in in tourism I wonder where this country would be

That's the usual claim, but I wonder how it can ever be calculated or proved. Say we got rid tomorrow, would any fewer people come to the country to visit ? The palaces would still be there to visit. I don't know, just musing.
.
 




countryman

Well-known member
Jun 28, 2011
1,893
That's the usual claim, but I wonder how it can ever be calculated or proved. Say we got rid tomorrow, would any fewer people come to the country to visit ? The palaces would still be there to visit. I don't know, just musing.
.

But it wouldn't have the same effect. Would the guards still stand outside Buckingham Palace? And events like the Royal wedding last year brought a lot of tourists to London. Just think how many Americans visit London to see our Royal family (they probably don't actually see them but they can hope) because they want a royal family like ours. And the Queen does a lot of goo in the commonwealth.
 


Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
But it wouldn't have the same effect. Would the guards still stand outside Buckingham Palace? And events like the Royal wedding last year brought a lot of tourists to London. Just think how many Americans visit London to see our Royal family (they probably don't actually see them but they can hope) because they want a royal family like ours. And the Queen does a lot of goo in the commonwealth.

True the changing of the guards probably wouldn't exist, and I guess that's fun to watch for a tourist. The Royal Wedding was blamed for a dip in GDP due to the extra bank holiday, so what you gain with one hand you lose with the other. I'm not that bothered either way, just thinking out loud.
 


W.C.

New member
Oct 31, 2011
4,927
this tourism thing is nonsense
 






W.C.

New member
Oct 31, 2011
4,927
A well thought-out and articulate contribution. I expect to see you on question time very soon.

OK, I should have said, 'I think, this tourism thing is nonsense'.

In my opinion it is. I think it's a ridiculous idea that people visit the UK because of the Royal Family. They do a bit of promo work I'll give them that but that's about it. People go for LONDON. Not cause that lot occasionally live there.

And opinion is all those who believe they do bring in the tourists have got.

So I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
 








beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,444
tbf the tourist arguement is pretty thin, tourists go for history and architecture, not because someone is (or often isnt) in the buliding. I dont think Netherlands or Sweden use this as justification to retain their monarchs.
 


NickBHAFC18

New member
Feb 24, 2012
1,720
Brighton
Now we have an attractive female, Kate Middleton in there, I fully support them. Don't get me wrong, Lizzy is hot, but she's getting on a bit now.
 




Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
OK, I should have said, 'I think, this tourism thing is nonsense'.

In my opinion it is. I think it's a ridiculous idea that people visit the UK because of the Royal Family. They do a bit of promo work I'll give them that but that's about it. People go for LONDON. Not cause that lot occasionally live there.

And opinion is all those who believe they do bring in the tourists have got.

So I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Thank you I'm not putting either side, so we're not agreeing or disagreeing, just curious as to how these things are worked out. Others have pointed out things that people do come to see, e.g. changing of the guard etc., but as to whether they bring in more than they cost, I really have no idea. It's not just the civil list that they cost, I presume security and travel etc. is not included in the CL and that must cost a fortune.
 


magoo

New member
Jul 8, 2003
6,682
United Kingdom
My main problem is that there's so bloody many of them. All we need for the tourists is a Queen/King a couple of Princes/Princesses and that's it. Anyone outside of that can just become a commoner and have to work for a living.
 








Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
14,001
Central Borneo / the Lizard
The royal family is one of the main ways we're defined overseas. Mad to see the royal wedding broadcast on local TV in my local cornershop in the middle of Borneo. To say they have no impact on our image as a tourist destination is crazy-speak. I have never been to Buck palace without seeing people 3 deep outside the fence.
 


W.C.

New member
Oct 31, 2011
4,927
Thank you I'm not putting either side, so we're not agreeing or disagreeing, just curious as to how these things are worked out. Others have pointed out things that people do come to see, e.g. changing of the guard etc., but as to whether they bring in more than they cost, I really have no idea. It's not just the civil list that they cost, I presume security and travel etc. is not included in the CL and that must cost a fortune.

to go off on a slight tangent it would be interesting to hear what most people do travel to Britain for. I would imagine London is the main draw. History another. Shame about the weather, don't think enough people abroad appreciate quite how beautiful the UK is.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top