gazwag said:
But why would option 1 be preferable, all that will happen is ODPM say yes again and LDC called JR again, thereby wasting another year or six, a JR on its own will either tell LDC to f*** off or send it back to the ODPM wont it, with the likelyhood being the FO answer
Or am I wrong
Heffle Gull said:Surely option 1 would be preferable, as JP would say Yes, but take into account the objections of LDC, thereby removing their grounds for a Judicial Review. LDC could take this back to a JR, but they would have to come up with a whole new set of grounds for appeal?
Option 1 would in theory be quicker and cheaper for all concerned