Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
NO IT DOESN'TThe tone of this guy's posts screams troll, stop getting so wound up people
regards
DR
NO IT DOESN'TThe tone of this guy's posts screams troll, stop getting so wound up people
You said don't judge it based on who she is. I didn't. I started watching, and it was really dull. Of course no one can be bothered to waste 3 hours of their time on such a poor presentation. If you're seriously suggesting that people waste over 3 hours of their time watching something so badly done, so dull and misguided, then I suggest you're trolling.oh my good f*cking god. what have I just been saying dumbo. ? why bother if no one can be arsed to watch, you've dismissed it before ever f*cking seeing it you goon.
This where it falls down, its not just the BBC is it even talksport got in on the action with running commentary at the time by Alan Brazil and Mike Parry !!!
same ol same ol. just as I cant clarify any truth neither can you..so why dismiss it completely. just like someone on here has already pointed out some c/t cases have already proved bang to rightsYou can't prove that these videos are either fake or real because they are unsourced and uncited - this is what I'm trying to explain to you - they are absolutely worthless and should be ignored.
If, let's say, Bill Clinton came out and publicly exposed the Illuminati - that would be a credible source and would raise a lot of eyebrows.
On the flip side - I could make a very convincing video of my mate Jack purporting to be a former driver of the illuminati, and then goes onto reveal all kinds of sinister secrets of theirs. To you, with your current understanding of "evidence" you would lap this up - to you, this would be further proof that the illuminati exists. However reasonable people would have ignored this video as nonsense all along, because it is a video with zero credibility - and they would be right.
So really you need to gain a better understanding of what "evidence" is - and start being more cynical about the credibility of your sources. You should probably look to the most reliable sources of knowledge, found in academia. My advice for you is to read more about political history and theory - it would only be a matter of time before you understand how the world really works and let go of this bizarre "illuminati" conspiracy theory that is clearly disturbing you.
No, not at all, its the ridiculousness of the idea that the BBC would hide something on the USAs behalf. Why do you think that the BBC would be involved in such ridiculousness?
fabian society,
Isnt it strange that they have so much power and orchestrate everything that happens in the world yet youtube manage to get a confession on video!!!! People will beleive anything. .......hence why religion still exists
Now that's something I hadn't thought about. If these people are so all powerful surely they would own or at least control Youtube. So how do CT videos not get deleted ?
Just thought I'd bring in a bit of football to the thread...
How did Brighton know what Bellotti and Archer were up to? Was it through mainstream credible news sources? or was it a conspiracy the club fans deemed true?
Is it 'fact' they messed around with the clause in the contract of the ground? Or is it conspiracy?
has anyone got any evidence of the contract?
Wait for it " they leaked the video as a double bluff so the truth will be ridiculed on purpose"
Nothing to do with a contract and everything to do with the Articles of Association which are freely available from Companies House.
Wasn't there a clause in the ground lease which meant if the ground was sold, all proceeds would go to the Albion?
wasn't this what Bellotti and Archer fiddled with?
I could be wrong?
No that was the AoA
care to explain to an idiot like me?
illuminati,
Hardly a secret society are they, dimwit. You only have to be centre-left and middle class to join. What conspiracy they up to? Making life slightly better for the workers. You joker, you.