pastafarian
Well-known member
So how did the 'CTs' know about the sex scandals of recent way before it came out in the news?
they didnt
So how did the 'CTs' know about the sex scandals of recent way before it came out in the news?
I wholeheartedly agree that we should question everything, particularly authority and dogmas!
My disagreement with you is that I do not consider an uncited, unsourced amateur YouTube video of an unknown miscellaneous woman without any kind of context to be evidence - it should be dismissed as a waste of time for a multitude of reasons.
Evidence has to be reliable, otherwise it's not evidence. What makes you so sure that the woman isn't a liar, an actress or simply crazy? These are the kinds of questions you should be asking before being duped by these ridiculous conspiracy theories.
they didnt
there are untold amounts of videos.exposing all this kind of stuff, ...
Are you referring to the dull 3 hour monologue? Of course no one ****ing watched it, it was dull. I managed 1 or 2 minutes of it, but it was just some old lady talking about her life and her husband.
If there was credible evidence to back up your theory, then of course people would take it seriously, but there isn't.
That's fair enough. There's a lot of misinformation out there so people miss the obvious stuff, but there's no harm in having an inquisitive mind. If someone else wants to believes that video, they shouldn't be ridiculed for it, especially now.
Many people were and are getting mocked for the Jill dando conspiracy. We need to learn from our mistakes.
oh my good f*cking god. what have I just been saying dumbo. ? why bother if no one can be arsed to watch, you've dismissed it before ever f*cking seeing it you goon.
are you aware of how many people have watched that 3 hour video
*Puts hand up*
Pick me, pick me.
So how did the 'CTs' know about the sex scandals of recent way before it came out in the news? how comes the crazy CT's got that right whilst all the really clever, intelligent, open minded people laughed it off as madness?
Some conspiracies theories are plausible, however any CTer that includes 911 in their mantra damages their own credibility. The trouble with the diehard CTer is that they are unable to dismiss fantasy using a rational thought process, and for all intent and purposes never cast a shadow of doubt on any part of an elaborate sequence of events.
With the WTC a CTer will always insist the explosives were set off in the basement, but it is clear from all the videos, that the buildings collapsed at the point of the plane impacts. My rule is to test a CTer on the WTC and if they fail, I know that they are easily (self) brainwashed and will believe anything.
...and the BBC would hide something that happened in the USA? Why?
They aren't exactly enemies.
So what do you make of the 3 video above?
Can you see why people struggle to believe 'offiical version' of 9/11 when things like the 3 videos above happen?
Would yo trust that man? I certainly wouldn't.
They aren't exactly enemies.
So what do you make of the 3 video above?
Can you see why very few people struggle to believe 'offiical version' of 9/11 when things like the 3 videos above happen?
Would yo trust that man? I certainly wouldn't.