Brighton V QPR
- Thread starter Halftime Oranges
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Shizuoka Dolphin
NSC M0DERATOR
Just to cheer us up a bit.
sleepynick
New member
nice
that did work a bit.
that did work a bit.
We deserved at least a point out of that, all three of QPR's goals were the result of either sloppy or just downright suicidal defending.
I don't deny that they were the better team in the second half, but equally we were far better in the first. Chippy being back will be a boost, I didn't think Hammond was all that effective really today. And both Cullip and Mayo looked dodgy at the back, I think Butters was missed more than perhaps we thought he would be.
I don't deny that they were the better team in the second half, but equally we were far better in the first. Chippy being back will be a boost, I didn't think Hammond was all that effective really today. And both Cullip and Mayo looked dodgy at the back, I think Butters was missed more than perhaps we thought he would be.
dougdeep
New member
I thought we got what we deserved. We were struggling for a good twenty minutes before they equalized at 2-2 and then we make substitutions. I couldn't believe it when they were more attacking changes, a draw would have done surely.
How they decided on man of the match I don't know. Now we'll have to win at the Priestfield.
How they decided on man of the match I don't know. Now we'll have to win at the Priestfield.
Knightsworld
Well-known member
dougdeep said:
I agree totally. Hammond was non-existent for the 2nd half and should of been replaced on the hour for Chippy or Oatway as we were getting totally overrun in the midfield.
The fact that no substitution was made whilst we were still 2-1 up is going to be my first questioning in Maghee's tactical awareness.
We should of gone on to win this game comfortably, but give credit to QPR for their 2nd half performance they never gave it up once.
BRIGHT ON Q
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 9,420
Agree,just because we were winning,it was still crying out for a change or 2 but he dosn't do it unless we go behind,then it takes a while.
Tony Le Mesmer
Well-known member
When I heard Harding and Mayo were playing, I assumed that they were both down the left side.
Surely it would have been better to have played Hinsh at Centre back to replace Butters with Mayo left back and Harding left midfield. El Ab blokey at right back with Nikolas and Hammond in the centre. Currie out on right wing.
What do I know??
Pissed off.
This is the sort of result we have to avoid as its beginning to repeat two years a go - losing to teams who will be around us come the end of the season.
Must beat the Gills now
Surely it would have been better to have played Hinsh at Centre back to replace Butters with Mayo left back and Harding left midfield. El Ab blokey at right back with Nikolas and Hammond in the centre. Currie out on right wing.
What do I know??
Pissed off.
This is the sort of result we have to avoid as its beginning to repeat two years a go - losing to teams who will be around us come the end of the season.
Must beat the Gills now