Quite simply, we're controlling the game(mostly) , and understandably we're not taking too many risks. We really don't want to lose this, and a draw would be 'okay'
I still feel this is a 1 -2.
I still feel this is a 1 -2.
I’d say that sort of thing isn’t normally given (the hug). As long as it’s minimal and then stops - happens at every set piece. Dunks reaction was too strong and obvious. Wissa’s was clearly a foul. I just don’t get how VAR didn’t spot the Dunk pull.Watch it again - if you don’t agree, fair play, but fancy explaining why Wissa hugging Dunk (who naturally then shoved him off) isn’t a foul?
There's difference between controlling possession and attacking. Trouble is we don't seem to know what it isAtmosphere sounds awful, can only hear our lot.
Frustrating game so far, controlling it well enough but it's got counter attack sucker punch written all over it.
Lallana and Größ playing well. So much more confident with Bart between the sticks too.
Maybe the injuries is due to the manager?Potter didn't have the injury problems we've had. Plus he's a ****.
I’m not, several others making the obvious point that Dunk shoved him off because Wissa hugged him. VAR agreed too!I think you're on your own with this one
Noticed that. Who's the little dick head in the middle for them with longish hair. Every challenge his in the refs ear asking for a booking. Little twunt...Ref ignores the Brentford players making the card him gesture about dunk.
That of course is a possibility.Maybe the injuries is due to the manager?
Agree that the first foul by Wissa wouldn’t be enough to give the pen by itself. But Dunk shoving him off was entirely proportionate - is he supposed to just stand unable to move?I’d say that sort of thing isn’t normally given (the hug). As long as it’s minimal and then stops - happens at every set piece. Dunks reaction was too strong and obvious. Wissa’s was clearly a foul. I just don’t get how VAR didn’t spot the Dunk pull.
Exactly. If Wissa is allowed to impede his run then Dunk is allowed to shove him off. Could (should) have been given.Hmm Wissa barged into Dunk before Dunk supposedly fouled him before Dunk was pull down
Blue and white tinted glasses!Dumbfounded by the number of people not seeing this, am I hallucinating. There was 3 fouls - first by Wissa, second by Dunk, final one by Wissa. If Dunk started that then I’m the Pope.
But the contact by Wissa is nowhere near enough a foul. The next contact by Dunk is nailed on. Totally correct decision by ref and we'd have been gutted if on the wrong end of that.Dumbfounded by the number of people not seeing this, am I hallucinating. There was 3 fouls - first by Wissa, second by Dunk, final one by Wissa. If Dunk started that then I’m the Pope.
He's definitely not allowed to foul the player.Agree that the first foul by Wissa wouldn’t be enough to give the pen by itself. But Dunk shoving him off was entirely proportionate - is he supposed to just stand unable to move?
My money is on the geeseNah, Canadiens vs Panthers now for a while…
It really wasn’t. And if you need proof it’s the fact that 90% of Brighton fans in this forum don’t think it was and we are all desperate for us to score and win the game.Wissa had both arms around Dunk, that’s why he pushed him off. Then Wissa grabs him from behind, defo penalty.