- Jul 7, 2003
- 48,442
You've described just about every Premier and Championship club there. Nationality apart of course.
True. List below is all the clubs in the top two divisions with foreign ownership. Not to be xenophobic about it, merely speculating that these investor types come in with no sense of the club or its history/culture, and no stake in the local community. It seems to be all about the potential fortune to be made by gaining promotion or finishing high up the Premier League.
Chelsea- Russia
Man City- Abu Dhabi
Man United- USA
Arsenal- USA/Russia
Villa- USA
Hull City- Egypt (albeit with a local East Yorkshire background)
Leicester- Thailand
Liverpool- USA
QPR- Malaysia/India
Southampton- Switzerland
Sunderland- USA
Everton, Palace (for now), Swansea, West Ham (partly- they have some Icelandic investment), Newcastle, Burnley & Spurs are still UK owned (in Spurs' case, by a billionaire tax exile who resides overseas).
Birmingham- China/Hong Kong
Blackburn- India
Blackpool- part owned by a Latvian, currently in major conflict with the Oystons
Bournemouth- Russia
Cardiff- Malaysia
Charlton- Belgium
Derby- USA
Fulham- USA/Pakistan
Leeds- Italy/Bahrain (this week)
Millwall- USA
Forest- Kuwait
Reading- Russia
Sheffield Wednesday- Serbia, rumoured to be in the process of a sale to new foreign investors
Watford- Italy.
Ourselves, Rotherham, Bolton, Brentford, Huddersfield, Middlesbrough, Ipswich and Norwich are the other non-foreign owned clubs.
It seems the Premier League is seen as the golden goose by a lot of these investors. Football rarely makes people money, however- with the exception of the players and agents- so it's bizarre that many of them see it as a worthwhile investment. If you went on Dragons Den and asked for a stack of cash to invest in- say- Millwall, they'd laugh you out of the room. Is it a prestige thing? The glory by association of being linked in people's minds to a premium product? Even if you own Charlton Athletic?