Biggest team achievement of 2016 so far

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

Leicester City.. They won the league over 38 games, not over a 7 game tournament.

Is the only sane answer.

 

[mothy]

Southern railway team?

 

[Don Tmatter]

Vote Leave team?

 

[brakespear]

Is Wales actually that big of an achievement?

Yes getting to the Semis is better than they could have imagined, but it's not like the starting 11 is that bad?

Ramsey,Bale,Williams,Davies, Allen, Ledley, Chester, Taylor etc are not bad players are they, all premiership players and a few have Played in the CL and Won things.

I would say the semis is one round better than that team should be getting to but not even close to Leicester, or even Northern Ireland.

Exactly - I would say Wales' progression is no more remarkable than Portugal's for example.

 

[Triggaaar]

I don't get this nonsense about Portugal being "awful". They've got the job done every single time.

They didn't win a single game in the group stage, and finished third in the group, relying on other teams to do worse. It wasn't great.

 

[Triggaaar]

Must be Iceland

They're a tiny nation, they did well, but they only beat Austria and England. What odds would you have got for that? Nothing like the odds on Leicester winning the PL I wouldn't think.

 

[Taybha]

They're a tiny nation, they did well, but they only beat Austria and England. What odds would you have got for that? Nothing like the odds on Leicester winning the PL I wouldn't think.

Very true , i think the total acc positive odds of the Icelandic team worked out at just under 1000-1 , Leicester's were 5000-1 i think ? Population of Leicester is 330k , Icelands is 323k this means bugger all but i like the look of that stat .

 

[Stat Brother]

It certainly won't be British cycling at the Olympics.

As well as they'll do, the rest of the cycling world has finally got it's act together re 'marginal gains' etc.
Expect the gold medals to be shared around a bit more, the cycling team certainly won't be the 10th best nation.

 

[Triggaaar]

Very true , i think the total acc positive odds of the Icelandic team worked out at just under 1000-1

Was that to get to the quarter final, or win the cup?

 

[Taybha]

Was that to get to the quarter final, or win the cup?

No just the accumilitive single match odds of the games they won and drew that got them to the Quarter final .

 

[Triggaaar]

No just the accumilitive single match odds of the games they won and drew that got them to the Quarter final .

That's not making a lot of sense to me. Do you mean the odds of them drawing with Hungary and Portugal, and beating Austria and England?

 

[Taybha]

Yes best odds i could see for each positive result for those 4 games *5-1, * 4-1 , 7-1 , 7-1 , = 980-1

* Enhanced odds , the portugal game was with Skybet the Hungary game was with Bet 365

 

[Badger]

The coverage I was watching of England v Iceland had Peter Drury commentating. He seemed to think Iceland winning was the greatest event EVER in the entire history of the UNIVERSE. So it must be them.

 

[bhafc4life03]

England actually being able to win a game this tournament (against Wales), seems quite a big achievement, perhaps that should be on the list!!

 

[Garry Nelson's Left Foot]

Leicester for me. You have to go back close to 40 years for an achievement of similar magnitude and that was done in the days before the big clubs had bazillions of pounds to squirrel away a reserve team of international quality players.

Wales winning the Euros would be a great achievement but you only have to go back 3 tournaments to find a (weaker) team lifting the trophy. And another three tournaments before that for another unfancied team doing the same. For this to be of a similar rareness as Leicester winning the premier league you'd have to go something like 150 years of Euro tournaments before a small country won it.

The whitewash of the aussies is another great achievement and is suitably rare....but it was only three games and, frankly, it's kind of embarrassing that it's taken us this long to do it.

 

[Poyningsgull]

England getting out of the group for me.

 

[Publius Ovidius]

True, but they are only friendlies.

actually thinking about it, they are not actually friendlies. they are termed as test matches, I suppose in the same way as when England play cricket against Australia, they are not termed friendlies, they are test series.

mute point I suppose

 

[Uncle Buck]

actually thinking about it, they are not actually friendlies. they are termed as test matches, I suppose in the same way as when England play cricket against Australia, they are not termed friendlies, they are test series.

mute point I suppose

I guess so, but generally see the Six Nations and the World Cup as competitive games, with these 'tests' as a chance to blood players.

 

[Triggaaar]

Yes best odds i could see for each positive result for those 4 games *5-1, * 4-1 , 7-1 , 7-1 , = 980-1

But that doesn't make sense. They didn't have to draw, draw, win, win (in 90). They just had to finish top 3 in a group of 4, then beat the next team. Not very long odds really.

 

[Albion my Albion]

Brighton's social media team. Including this message board.