Oatway4England
New member
- Mar 17, 2011
- 107
Okay i know its only for one game but the bloke shouldn't even be near the starting 11 for England......

Okay i know its only for one game but the bloke shouldn't even be near the starting 11 for England......![]()
Didn't even make the bench against Wales... Just seems a strange decision to me.
shouldn't be near the first 11? is this the same Gareth Barry that plays 30+ games a season in the Premiership at a top 4 club and was, until recently, widely considered one of the best/most consistant England players? some people are fickle.
If we play the second string I will be happy, we need to start giving fringe players a go.
Wilshere and Parker started against Denmark and kept there places in the team for sat.
Seriously, I didnt think he has been playing that much this season?
23 games plus 3 in europe, ok not quite 30 yet. and ok i over egged the top four (though last time i checked, Man City is in the top4 this year).
yes, he isnt as good as he has been in the past, but that still apparently good enough for Mancini and still should be contender for first 11. maybe somthing like this will set him right again.
Agree. That's why it's massively pointless to play Barry, let alone have him as captain. He has many caps, everyone knows all about him, what is to learn from playing him in a friendly against Ghana? Nothing.If we play the second string I will be happy, we need to start giving fringe players a go.
I think this is exactly how friendlies should be used. You need to give fringe players a chance to play 90 minutes. How are they going to learn/adapt otherwise? It's a much better way to integrate them into international football than by swapping 70% of the team at half time. Plus, I'd imagine that fringe players care more about a friendly than the regulars as it's a chance to further their claim to a position in the team/the bench.