Barker & agdestein?

[BensGrandad]

How many time must people be told that neither Adgestein or Barker are good enough to play more than a nominal last 15 mins if we are winning they would not be the answer if Ulloa was injured.

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

How many time must people be told that neither Adgestein or Barker are good enough to play more than a nominal last 15 mins if we are winning they would not be the answer if Ulloa was injured.

You are absolutely right.

We have potentially a very big problem now.

All we can do is trust to luck that Ulloa won't get injured like the others.

 

[The Fifth Column]

How many time must people be told that neither Adgestein or Barker are good enough to play more than a nominal last 15 mins if we are winning they would not be the answer if Ulloa was injured.

But without any other choices we may be forced to play either one or both! It might surprise a lot of people to find that in a first team match situation they might switch on more and step themselves up a gear, it can hardly be the most motivating experience playing in DS games after all. We are likely to find out one way or another I think.

 

[Bullshit Man]

Cometh the hour...

Cometh the man...

 

[BensGrandad]

In an emergency I would suggest that Gus would play either Vicente or Buckley up front and build around them, for support.

 

[thony]

How many time must people be told that neither Adgestein or Barker are good enough to play more than a nominal last 15 mins if we are winning they would not be the answer if Ulloa was injured.

Rubbish! Several times Gus has pointed out that he doesn't put players on the bench unless he feels they are good enough to play in the first team.
Admittedly they wouldn't be expected to be up to the same standard as Ulloa or Macca, but Gus obviously feels they're good enough to do a job.

 

[severnside gull]

I would lay good money that Barker is on the bench at Forest. When he becomes unavailable Barnes will be back and meanwhile we have some very very good attacking midfielders who are scoring reasonably frequently. We will be okay.

 

[Napper]

When is Barnes back ?

Everytime Ulloa goes over going to be heart in mouth time

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

When is Barnes back ?

Everytime Ulloa goes over going to be heart in mouth time

Barnes is missing for

Forest
Charlton
Leicester
Middlesbrough
Peterborough

 

[Napper]

Barnes is missing for

Forest
Charlton
Leicester
Middlesbrough
Peterborough

cheers

not great

 

[BensGrandad]

How many time must people be told that neither Adgestein or Barker are good enough to play more than a nominal last 15 mins if we are winning they would not be the answer if Ulloa was injured.

Rubbish! Several times Gus has pointed out that he doesn't put players on the bench unless he feels they are good enough to play in the first team.
Admittedly they wouldn't be expected to be up to the same standard as Ulloa or Macca, but Gus obviously feels they're good enough to do a job.

I would lay good money that Barker is on the bench at Forest. When he becomes unavailable Barnes will be back and meanwhile we have some very very good attacking midfielders who are scoring reasonably frequently. We will be okay.

As I have said good enough to be on the bench to come on in an EMERGENCY but not to start in place of Ulloa if he is either injured or suspended. Had it happened an experienced man to do the same would have been better, interestingly Holloway has found one.

 

[pornomagboy]

Bring back Dickinson

 

[otk]

Barker is the real deal, especially around the box, hence him getting us a (missed) pen recently, whereas Angestein is a preening nancy boy, a la the flop Dickenson from a couple of seasons ago...