Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Attn of Robert Lester Zamora



Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Didn't you tell us over a week ago DK had Coppell's replacement already lined up ?

Why the two/three week delay now????
 
Last edited:






marvin

New member
Jul 5, 2003
1,670
The corner quietly rusting
Cos Bob is being paid any way and 2 -3 weeks saving on a managers salary is quite a lot.

You learnt nothing as to why they did not appoint a manager over the summer months last year!
 


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
marvin said:
Cos Bob is being paid any way and 2 -3 weeks saving on a managers salary is quite a lot.

You learnt nothing as to why they did not appoint a manager over the summer months last year!

Personally have no problem with Bob being given the job it was just that RLZ seemed VERY sure that it was all in hand.

It's Bob then is it.

Re last summer, I think the delay was down to a certain ex Man U winger and Palace manager not being able to make a decision . You really should pay more attention marvin :p
 


marvin

New member
Jul 5, 2003
1,670
The corner quietly rusting
yeah right then they gave it to Hinch!

I did not say its Bob I said letting him runs things for a couple of weeks financially make sense.
 




I don't think RLZ claimed that the new manager was "already lined up" or that it was "all in hand".

I think RLZ had reasons to believe that DK "knew who he wanted".

Not quite the same thing.
 


It's seems quite appropriate that there should be a delay, to let BB take the reins, give transition some time , and test how the players respond to a 'lack of Coppell'.

The first couple of games will see the players proving that they are playing for the club foremost, and weren't just putting themselves out for the old manager only. It asks something of the character of the team and the individuals.
Since they apparently like BB, they will probably want to underline his status as a capable and affable man to work with as well.
As a politic, it behooves DK to show confidence in all the staff currently at the club - and they've now got 3 more points, three goals and a clean sheet. The best win-margin this season isn't it?

The true test comes when we need a tactician to compete in a tough contest, and turn things around - and also after a few weeks when the results of training techniques bear fruit - or go fruitless.

There's really no need to rush into anything because SC left, and look desparate - a vote of confidence has been given to BB as a professional member of the staff regardless of when we get another manager in.
However, with due respect to MH, if Bob Booker were to say something like "I can now retire, the lads have made me a happy man" after this win, I'd be getting very nervous!
 


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Lord Bracknell said:
I don't think RLZ claimed that the new manager was "already lined up" or that it was "all in hand".

I think RLZ had reasons to believe that DK "knew who he wanted".

Not quite the same thing.

Pretty sure it was more definate than DK knows who he wants , are you sure it isn't on a thread that's gone "missing":ohmy:
 




Mustela Furo

Advantage Player
Jul 7, 2003
1,481
I mentioned that DK was already prepared for the possibility of losing Coppell when the West Ham vacancy occured and therefore had already started thinking ahead.

Next week sees the restart of the Falmer inquiry which will take up a lot of DK's time for a fortnight.

That is why, imho, DK is allowing himself two-three weeks for the appointment.

I believe that he knows who he wants and has probably already had initial discussions with that party - but at the same time he is also interested to see "what turns up in the post" over the next week.

DK is nothing if not thorough.

In the interim the "delay" gives Bob Booker a shout. If he keeps on winning (and DK's initial choice doesn't pan out) then he may just have a chance of the job.
 


Turkey

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
15,587
I think Booker will get the job. I don't want him to get it but I think he will.
 


Trigger

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
40,458
Brighton
Turkey said:
I think Booker will get the job. I don't want him to get it but I think he will.
Spot on, he's such a top bloke and i'm just worried if things go wrong for him we'll lose him from the club altogether...
 






Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
Bob is the one consistent and stabilising member of the coaching staff and one of the reasons we have been able to bounce back each time we have been knocked by losing managers.

For this reason alone I feel he should remain as assistant manager.

I would hope the incoming manager would recognise his worth and keep him here too.
 


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Yorkie said:

I would hope the incoming manager would recognise his worth and keep him here too.

I doubt he would get a choice.
 




ac gull

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
2,054
midlands
Agree with RLZ re DK spending time at the Falmer enquiry being the reason for the 2 to 3 week delay

Sunday Times today quotes that Tony Adams has expressed an interest but that he is not being pusued by DK "at this stage"

Agree that DK will have thought about who he wants to replace Coppell from when Reading first called him - which was a good two weeks plus before Coppell left

Would be amazed if it is not Ian Dowie

After the Oldham match yesyterday he was talking about hoping "they" survive as a club rather than "us" which may mean his mind is elsewhere - this is how Taylor used to refer to us in about April a few weeks before he left

As Booker is out of contract at the end of the season - I would expect DK to get the new manager and Booker ( with a pay rise ) to both sign contracts to the end of June 2005 - this would give us a bit of stability

Dowie and Booker would seem to be very similar personality wise and would hit it off very quickly

Dowie has taken a team living from day to day on a 9 game unbeaten run - so obviously knows what he is doing - he fits all of Knights citeria

- plays good football - yes
- shows loyalty - sticking with Oldham through bad times
- is ambitious - why he joined Oldham - spoke of "broken promises" re Chairman who puuled the plug financially
- can nuture squad - has clearly proved his ability to do this at Oldham this season

Also Rob Forzoni who was Coppells coach / sports psychologist has also left and gone to Reading with him as well - negotiating this being the reason for the delay in joining Reading - as well as the reason for the delay in Coppell signing the contract with us last summer as well

As for Coppell signing any of our players - I would not be surprised to see Rehman sign on loan for the season at Reading from Fulham - but do not believe he will sign either of Knight or Cullip

DK would be right to sell either of them is the price is right as both have contracts that expire in June 2004 - if they refuse to sign new deals next summer then would be right to sell them

Although I believe both will be offered improved contract extensions next summer by the new manager
 


Lush

Mods' Pet
I would be happy to have Booker as manager if we had a decent Director of Football with a grasp of tactics and strategy rather than Martin Tinselhead.

I had a horrible feeling of deja vu in the first half yesterday - it was just like the Hinshelwood years (OK weeks but it felt like years! Players playing with very little idea of what they're supposed to be doing - Cullip arguing with Michel etc. I reckon Booker told them at half-time that if they didn't buck their ideas up, he wouldn't have a cat in hells chance of the job - and, as we know, players like internal appointments because new managers might bring in new players in their position.

We need a strategist at the club. Mind you if it is true that Booker was on the phone to Hinshelwood taking notes in the stands, I may have to eat my words.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here