Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 74,109
- Thread starter
- #21
You don't have to look the part if you can score 16 goals.
He takes a decent penalty, I'll give him that

You don't have to look the part if you can score 16 goals.
He takes a decent penalty, I'll give him that![]()
Same as you, I just want us to be the best that we can be. And that goal tally had very little to do with the Hemed Baldock partnership. It's a partnership that won't do us any favours at all next season IMHO.
Oh hang on, I get it. This thread is to deter any people from other clubs lurking around here to see who we think are worth snaffling away, so we try to make out we don't like these two. Well played THPP.
You say no favours but it is a partnership which got us to 3rd in reality. Hemed scored 12 over the 2nd half of the season and I could be wrong but i do not think we lost a league game with them playing together.
Even if that's fishing, it's not a great comment, I suggest
Hemed and Baldock are perfectly good enough as 2 of our 4 strikers.
It's the 2 recruits we sign up which we need to be more interested in.
It's a squad game. We need to bring in 2 seriously quality strikers to challenge these 2, however both are key players. Hemed's hold up play is underrated by many on NSC - I'd also say he's better on the ball than Ulloa...
I agree that Hemed's hold up play -- his strength on the ball, his tenacity, and his skill -- is vastly under-rated on here but, then again, I'm not convinced it's better than Ulloa's.
I thought Ernest had started this thread
Agree with OP despite Hemeds goals the team need to improve to go again next season![]()
Has he ever looked HALF the part that Ulloa did? Will there be a single club at this level or above clamouring for his services close season? I think not.
Yes, that's nice but he still scored more than Ulloa regardless of whether another club comes sniffing around.