drew
Drew
They don't deserve a pay rise principally on the basis that they are public servants and all other public servants are on a pay freeze, especially that half of them are the ones that are imposing the freeze in the first place.
Also, let's not forget that they get very beneficial allowances for lunch, travel etc. Most of us have to pay for travel to work and for our lunches when we are there so that comes out of our salary but not MPs.
As for second jobs, I also believe that an MP should be a full time role. It's a load of boll*x about them having experience which helps their decision making. Yes, by all means have had a career before or after but not during. Also, how does an MP who is employed as a non executive director of say a tobacco firm remain impartial? Equally it could be argued that labour MPs should not be card carrying members of unions.
Also, let's not forget that they get very beneficial allowances for lunch, travel etc. Most of us have to pay for travel to work and for our lunches when we are there so that comes out of our salary but not MPs.
As for second jobs, I also believe that an MP should be a full time role. It's a load of boll*x about them having experience which helps their decision making. Yes, by all means have had a career before or after but not during. Also, how does an MP who is employed as a non executive director of say a tobacco firm remain impartial? Equally it could be argued that labour MPs should not be card carrying members of unions.