US Seagull
Well-known member
MYOB said:Compare the hardware of a G4 iMac to a G4 Amiga.
They still make Amigas?
MYOB said:Compare the hardware of a G4 iMac to a G4 Amiga.
I don't think I know what I'm talking about - I know I know what I'm talking about.
Apple make bad machines. Apple make an ugly OS, which is very very hard to programme for. I own Apple machines and I have programmed for them.
IBM made a relatively good architechture in Power, and didn't compromise it much in PowerPC. But Apple implement it badly, very very badly. Ever seen the errata list for Apple's OpenFirmware? Or the mess of code needed to even *boot* on a G1, 2 or 3 machine (Generation 1 and 2 weren't sold with those tm's, they were 601 and 603/4 respectively)
US Seagull said:As it is on Windows PC, and it's always ahead of the Mac version. Plus there are the multitude of other options on the PC.
As there are on the Mac, but Office is considered the standard on both so it makes sense to use it.
All doable on a suitably equip PC with a far larger selection of software to chose from. What's more you can have your PC be as powerful / not powerful as you want / can afford. Certainly not true of Macs. If I don't want to make movies or mix music so why should I pay for power I won't use? And where are the latest games?
I agree it is doable on a PC; I would disagree that there is a much larger selection of software to choose from however. A lot of top people in these professions use Macs and somehow I feel it isn't just because they look nice. Have you actually ever used a Mac? The latest games are generally available not long after PC versions come out; granted PCs are better for gaming but that's not an issue for me, or indeed anyone who buys a Mac as PCs are better in this respect, down to the fact that software support is superior. The gap is closing though.
You also don't need to pay for power you won't use. Apple currently make the eMac (low end, starts at £599 I think), the iMac G4 which is slightly more powerful. Then there's the Power Mac G5 for pros and the iMac G5 which is basically a very powerful home computer. Laptop-wise the iBook is the entry-level thing (and I LOVE mine) which is great for students such as myself, whilst the PowerBook is for the pros. So you can actually buy according to what you need.
Plug in a new one? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of having the computer and monitor in one box in the first place?
Not in my opinion as such things can be taken out if/when you need them. It is possible to replace the internal HD on a Mac, and two CD drives are wholly unnecessary as when copying CDs unless you feel that the advantage of not having to replace the CD being copied with a blank one once outweighs the cost of a second drive (in which case you have more money than sense)
You don't need drivers for USB hard drives in windows either. I know I just converted one of my old internal drive into an external USB drive. Plug it in and away you go. In fact, according to the manual with the enclosure kit you need to download drivers for the Mac. Still doesn't change the fact that maybe I don't want to pay extra for external drives and I don't want the clutter of a bunch of external drives?
Buy an internal one and replace the existing one instead then. And In my experience, plug and play with PCs was nothing short of a disaster.
Why are you so excited about a computer that is basically a non-folding laptop?
Lush said:
I love my iMac. It's one of those screen on a pole ones.
![]()
The Large One said:...and PCs are FAR more susceptible to viruses than Macs.