Mtoto
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2003
- 1,863
Isn't the whole "right to bear arms" thing a misinterpretation? I vaguely recall someone saying that it applied, historically, to taking up arms against enemies, foreign and domestic rather than stockpiling an arsenal in your basement.
The crucial sentence from the Second Amendment reads:
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
But the first clause always seems to be (conveniently) overlooked.
The Amendment was introduced at a time when independence from Britain was still in its infancy and very fragile. The US was not really secure as a new nation until after the War of 1812, during which the British occupied Washington. The intention of the Amendment was that loyal Americans would be able to mobilise and fight an invader at a moment's notice, not that over 200 years later, they would be able to carry concealed weapons everywhere for personal protection because, well, everyone else has got a gun too.