Which is why West Brom never made all that much sense to me. I don't remember any sweeping white cliffs there.White. As in cliffs and albino. Also as an archaic term for England
WBA had the 'Albion' suffix first. They used it because there was an sub district of West Bromwich called Albion where some of the players/founders had links. BHA formed from the defunct Brighton & Hove Rangers and were going to use 'United', but there was already a Hove United. Presumably they picked Albion because of the white cliffs, but also because WBA had set the precedent. I seem to remember that Albion Rovers, one of the very few teams that don't have a place name, formed from two teams and kept both suffixes.Which is why West Brom never made all that much sense to me. I don't remember any sweeping white cliffs there.
(Yes, I know the archaic term for England still applies)
Did not know that about West Brom. Learned something today.WBA had the 'Albion' suffix first. They used it because there was an sub district of West Bromwich called Albion where some of the players/founders had links. BHA formed from the defunct Brighton & Hove Rangers and were going to use 'United', but there was already a Hove United. Presumably they picked Albion because of the white cliffs, but also because WBA had set the precedent. I seem to remember that Albion Rovers, one of the very few teams that don't have a place name, formed from two teams and kept both suffixes.