Regardless or not of whether Ghadaffi was involved directly or indirectly in the welcome, and despite a nice polite letter from that nice Mr Brown, that sort of reaction from the locals was always going to happen.
Personally, I think Scotland made the right decision. If he was guilty, and assuming he is dying, it's right that he should be sent home.
And if he isn't guilty then it's definitely right.
From what I know of the case there seems to me to be a big chunk of reasonable doubt. As far as I know the only evidence against him was identification evidence of the shopkeeper in Malta as the guy who bought a shirt which may or may not be the shirt that may or may not have been wrapped round the initiator of the bomb.
The guy may well be guilty but I'd rather live in a society where these things need to be proved beyond reasonable doubt.
And if Jim Squire seriously doubts that he was involved then that's reasonable doubt enough for me.
How convenient that he's no longer guilty.
Why the f*** can they get away with giving him a heroes welcome, just about sums those people upthis may get me banned but i don't give a shit. The only way he should have gone home is in a box
![]()
Regardless or not of whether Ghadaffi was involved directly or indirectly in the welcome, and despite a nice polite letter from that nice Mr Brown, that sort of reaction from the locals was always going to happen.
Personally, I think Scotland made the right decision. If he was guilty, and assuming he is dying, it's right that he should be sent home.
And if he isn't guilty then it's definitely right.
From what I know of the case there seems to me to be a big chunk of reasonable doubt. As far as I know the only evidence against him was identification evidence of the shopkeeper in Malta as the guy who bought a shirt which may or may not be the shirt that may or may not have been wrapped round the initiator of the bomb.
The guy may well be guilty but I'd rather live in a society where these things need to be proved beyond reasonable doubt.
And if Jim Squire seriously doubts that he was involved then that's reasonable doubt enough for me.
But imagine the uproar if he makes a miraculous recovery!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2004/mar/31/lockerbie.libya
If you are interested in reading more than the bollocks produced by the CIA feel free to torrent this and read it. Be prepared to re-asses your view that he is guilty though.
Lockerbie - The flight from Justice, Private Eye special report (download torrent) - TPB
It was the PFLPGC with Syrian backing. Libya had nothing to do with it.
If you read Lockerbie, The Flight From Justice written by Foot and published by Private Eye, then Paul Foot puts forward quite convincing arguments that the bomb was a revenge attack carried out by the PFLPGC which was then based in Syria and IIRC headed by Abu Nidal and financed by Iran in revenge for the shooting down of an Iranian airbus by the USS Vincennes. An act incidentally for which the US has still not appologised or paid reparations I believe although I stand to be corrected
Unfortunately at the time of the first gulf war the US desperately needed syria on side and it was only then that Libya became the fall guy following a stitch up between thatcher and bush senior.
Megrahi was 'surrendered' by libya, desperate to regain legitimate access to world oil markets, in the expectation that with such laughable and flimsy 'evidence' he could not possibly be convicted and in fact his co-defendant was accquited. Unfortunately despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence he was convicted and the actual guilty, a PFLPGC cell based in West Germany were allowed to walk away from this crime.
It is one of the biggest miscariages of justice in the UK in the past 20 years.