A thread FULL of girls kissing

[TSB]

Point taken, but how is it funny?

Because you clicked on it expecting it to be teenage/young adult girls kissing and it was a 4ish year old girl KISSING a 4ish year old boy.

It's funny to me because it's been viewed over 200 times by people hoping it was that.

Not so funny when you have to break it down for people like kev.

 

[Les Biehn]

Point taken, but how is it funny?

Because like the rest of you I went 'sweet, sexy ladies kissing' but when I opened it it literally was what the thread title says which was not what I expected. Slim played a trick and showed what a bunch of pervs we are all are. Works on the same level as US's racing tips except the thread title is literal rather than a lie.

 

[Les Biehn]

Re: Re: A thread FULL of girls kissing

I honestly thought les and gina were older than that!

 

[Seagullible]

Because you clicked on it expecting it to be teenage/young adult girls kissing and it was a 4ish year old girl KISSING a 4ish year old boy.

It's funny to me because it's been viewed over 200 times by people hoping it was that.

Not so funny when you have to break it down for people like kev.

exactly.

 

[mejonaNO12 aka riskit]

its funny. some people are a tad to serious on here!

 

[Shizuoka Dolphin]

The OTT reaction of several GOONS is laughable.

 

[mejonaNO12 aka riskit]

i urge some of the LOSERS on here never to watch the peado episode of brass eye. they would have a FIT!

 

[turienzo's lovechild]

i found it funny


but i was also hoping for some TONGUE ACTION

so i am both amused, and disappointed

 

[Biscuit]

Made me laugh.

 

[¤DãŃn¥ §êãGüLL¤]

i urge some of the LOSERS on here never to watch the peado episode of brass eye. they would have a FIT!

Some of the posters on here remind me of that strip in Viz, I think it's "The Modern Parents" where a group of parents, led by one moaning old fart over-react to the slightest thing and are outside their kids school on a daily basis doing the angry mob thing with banners and flaming torches accusing all and sundry of paedophilia, the ironic thing was the bloke always turned out to be a nonce himself in the ending

 

[tedebear]

Because like the rest of you I went 'sweet, sexy ladies kissing' but when I opened it it literally was what the thread title says which was not what I expected. Slim played a trick and showed what a bunch of pervs we are all are. Works on the same level as US's racing tips except the thread title is literal rather than a lie.

I agree - but I don't like 4 year old kids being used like this...would have been funnier if it were that shot of the two grannies french kissing....

 

[Les Biehn]

I agree - but I don't like 4 year old kids being used like this...would have been funnier if it were that shot of the two grannies french kissing....

Used in what way? If you object to this than surely you object to the exploitation of children in adverts.

At least Slim's agenda was to poke a bit of fun at all of us rather than get us to buy crap.

 

[tedebear]

Used in what way? If you object to this than surely you object to the exploitation of children in adverts.

At least Slim's agenda was to poke a bit of fun at all of us rather than get us to buy crap.

Ok, I'll put it another way, given the "inquisitive" minds of most NSC'rs they would have opened this thread expecting so see something that would warm their "cockles", so with "excitable" thoughts in their minds they open the thread, to see two 4 year olds. Tagging the two together is a little "off" in my mind. Although it doesn't offend me greatly - I just think its not funny. Now if it were something really goofy (like the grannies) then I'd find it more hilarious!

I'm wondering if its because I have a little man of my own? Maybe I would have found it funnier before I had Arthur - hmmmm - possibly! Don't know..

Just my thoughts - not getting my knickers in a twist or anything- just don't think its funny...

 

[Normal Rob]

More like it...

 

[Les Biehn]

Ok, I'll put it another way, given the "inquisitive" minds of most NSC'rs they would have opened this thread expecting so see something that would warm their "cockles", so with "excitable" thoughts in their minds they open the thread, to see two 4 year olds. Tagging the two together is a little "off" in my mind. Although it doesn't offend me greatly - I just think its not funny. Now if it were something really goofy (like the grannies) then I'd find it more hilarious!

But why, its just a kiss. Just because of what people expected doesn't make the picture perverted in any way. Its not like the picture turns people on because of the implied nature of the thread through its title.

 

[Billy the Fish]

Ok, I'll put it another way, given the "inquisitive" minds of most NSC'rs they would have opened this thread expecting so see something that would warm their "cockles", so with "excitable" thoughts in their minds they open the thread, to see two 4 year olds. Tagging the two together is a little "off" in my mind.
Just my thoughts - not getting my knickers in a twist or anything- just don't think its funny...

Although I wasn't going to bother posting in this shit thread again, tedebear has got it right, there's just something wrong about dressing that picture up as if it was going to be something pervy.
Anyway, I remember the days when "Silm" was more likely to post a picture of himself than anything else. I thought he looked like he'd probably turn out to be a ped, or at very best some kind of sex case, and by the looks of it I was right.

 

[¡Cereal Killer!]

I wouldnt say it is sick but I wouldn't say it is funny

More like it...

Noe that is f***ing sweet

(The tattoo on the lady on the right doesnt look that good though)

 

[Les Biehn]

Although I wasn't going to bother posting in this shit thread again, tedebear has got it right, there's just something wrong about dressing that picture up as if it was going to be something pervy.
Anyway, I remember the days when "Silm" was more likely to post a picture of himself than anything else. I thought he looked like he'd probably turn out to be a ped, or at very best some kind of sex case, and by the looks of it I was right.

You appear to have swallowed a copy of the Daily Mail. Don't be a twat, how has he dressed it up as a 'pervy'. He played against our desires and expectations. The point of the picture is its not pervy at all, its the juxtoposition of the innocence and sweetness of the pic against what we wanted to see. You would only find it pervy if you were a peado.

 

[TSB]

Although I wasn't going to bother posting in this shit thread again, tedebear has got it right, there's just something wrong about dressing that picture up as if it was going to be something pervy.
Anyway, I remember the days when "Silm" was more likely to post a picture of himself than anything else. I thought he looked like he'd probably turn out to be a ped, or at very best some kind of sex case, and by the looks of it I was right.

I was about to respond to this, but then of course i noticed that you were referring to "Silm", so I needn't have felt annoyed with your blatant lying (there is no pictures of me on here, except posted by Dwayne).

Cheers to Les for his eloquence

And it's nice to have started a thread that has actually sparked some debate, so ta to those who got annoyed.

 

[Biscuit]

I wouldnt say it is sick but I wouldn't say it is funny



Noe that is f***ing sweet

(The tattoo on the lady on the right doesnt look that good though)

You should see where her Brighton badge is tatooed!