Seasidesage
New member
I thought she'd grown a pony tail?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[News] Margaret Thatcher Statue
- Thread starter Randy McNob
- Start date
I thought she'd grown a pony tail?
Who builds their home that close to a tree or plants a tree that close to their house. Guaranteed one of them will need to come down in the future
I agree with you, albeit, there are some exceptions; it isn't a black and white issue. I am not in favour of all and every statue, or the removal of all and every statue. Removing statues of old slave owners who nobody reveres, like Colston, (and storing the staue in a warehouse) is fine by me. Putting up a statue of Thatcher in Grantham, and protecting against its vandalism, is also fine by me. Keeping a statue of Churchill is fine by me. Not putting up a statue of Bernard Manning is also fine by me.
Also, I don't think that declining to put up a new statue of General Haig represents a rewriting of history, although I agree that the burning of books, including those with which I have issues such as the holy bible, the quran, mein kampf, is reprehensible. I like books. Perhaps I'm a hypocrite. Albeit books are kept in libraries, not on plinths in the town centre.
Palacefinder General
Well-known member
- Apr 5, 2019
- 2,594
Seasidesage
New member
I was hoping my comments were wooly enough to convey the same unease. This is the Greyest of Grey areas, my point was more the worry that globally people seem incapable of accepting another view or that the decisions made in a snapshot in history are not necessarily the ones that would be made now. Colston I get although throwing the statue in the Avon is going too far for me. Cecil Rhodes? More difficult although he clearly is an architect of some of Africa's problems now. Not sure there were a lot of street demonstrations against Imperialism at the time?
Captain Cook? Julius Caesar? Christopher Columbus? There are a lot of historical figures who judged through a 21st century lens don't come out of it too well. Where if anywhere is a line to be drawn?
London Irish
Well-known member
Eh? She started a pointless war to get re-elected when we were previously in the process of negotiating away sovereignty. That killed a thousand people.
Danny Wilson Said
New member
Rhodes is a tricky one, especially in Oxford with the Rhodes scholars. One of the most vocal supporters of removing the Rhodes statue from Oxford High Street was a Rhodes Scholar himself, so would have accepted money from the Rhodes foundation to study there. fair enough, I suppose, if Rhodes made the money to endow his scholarships from exploiting black Africans.
But if I've understood correctly, he wasn't the sort of racist who believed that native Africans were inferior to white people, but rather the sort who regarded them as uncivilised but capable of becoming the equal of whites eventually. And he made scholarships available to black students.
Incidentally, I was told by an Oxford resident that the statue was in a prominent position so that any black person on the top deck of a bus would have it in his or her face when it stopped outside Oriel College. Last time I was in Oxford I checked this out and it was bullsh*t, unless they have quadruple-decker buses, and there isn't a bus stop there anyway. Most people wouldn't notice the statue unless it was pointed out to them.
Last edited:
Hampster Gull
New member
- Dec 22, 2010
- 13,462
Was she? Or perhaps a conviction politician. Regardless, three times elected as PM for the UK
GT49er
Well-known member
Negotiating my a**e! What happened was that Sir John Nott-a-very-good-Defence-Secretary decided to scrap HMS Endurance, the Royal Navy's Antarctic patrol boat that protected the Falklands to save some money to spend on his lovely nuclear deterrents. General Galtieri, desperate to quell the unrest against his government in Argentina used his power of wishful thinking to assume this was an indication that the UK wouldn't exactly bust a gut to protect the rights of the Falkland islanders. So, for political gain, he ordered the invasion of the Falklands.
Boy, did he get that one badly wrong!
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
You could argue both leaders got it badly wrong. A 1000 ordinary lives lost because a dictator took a last throw of the dice, and a Prime Minister didn't let diplomacy and and international pressure see if it could force an Argentinian climb down. Galtieri was a dead man walking politically as it was.
I think Roger Waters summed it up all very nicely in Pink Floyd's 'Southampton Dock' from the moving anti war album The Final Cut:
They disembarked in 45
And no-one spoke and no-one smiled
There were too many spaces in the line.
Gathered at the cenotaph
All agreed with the hand on heart
To sheath the sacrificial knives.
But now
She stands upon Southampton dock
With her handkerchief
And her summer frock clings
To her wet body in the rain.
In quiet desperation knuckles
White upon the slippery reins
She bravely waves the boys Goodbye again.
And still the dark stain spreads between
Their shoulder blades.
A mute reminder of the poppy fields and graves.
And when the fight was over
We spent what they had made.
But, in the bottom of our hearts
We felt the final cut.
joydivisionovengloves
Well-known member
I look forward to needing a shit in Grantham.
We were at war, that ship posed a threat to British forces, even if only in the future.
GT49er
Well-known member
True enough, though Argentina had weeks in which it could have negotiated. Instead, they just ignored UN Security Council Resolution 502 which among other things demanded the withdrawal of all Argentine troops from the Falklands, pending negotiations through the UN. Sadly for all the young Argentine conscripts, most of whom didn't want to be there anyway, Galtieri wasn't having anything to do with UN resolutions.
Can you provide a link please to show that the UK Government were previously in the process of negotiating away sovereignty of the Falkland Isles, I served in the late 80’s and through the 90 ‘s with many FW vets who were more than happy to head down south and get stuck in and knew the risks, it was simple, Argentinian forces invade British Sovereign territory, British Government send troops down there to deal with it End Ex.
Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
Once war has been declared it has to be simply open warfare,like it or not.
JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
Looking forward to making the pilgrimage to pay homage .. 
Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
The GB could have turned around in under an hour. Thatcher was right. Any government sending people into conflict has to back them 101%.
Given that the maggie squad have now arrived from the pub, let's enjoy an old Falklands cartoon from Private Eye
