If you actually read the article rather then dismiss it, you’ll notice he talks some sense.
How refreshing that a chairman from a lower club stands up to the elite clubs.
If you actually understood what irony meant you wouldn't have commented as irony was the theme of the OP, not whether he was sensible or not in his comments.If you actually read the article rather then dismiss it, you’ll notice he talks some sense.
How refreshing that a chairman from a lower club stands up to the elite clubs.
If you actually understood what irony meant you wouldn't have commented as irony was the theme of the OP, not whether he was sensible or not in his comments.
The entire article hasn't been dismissed. This is the start of the article:If you actually read the article rather then dismiss it, you’ll notice he talks some sense.
When a football club (like his) screws over its creditors and by going into administration, that's not a sign of great resilience.'The thing with football clubs,' says Steve Parish, 'is that they're very resilient. If you go back 150 years you won't find 100 tie companies that are still in business. But almost all of the football clubs, one way or another, still are.'
I'm not blaming anyone for anything. As I said, irony is the theme, if you can't see it then there's no hope, if you can then you are trolling.What have the previous admins got to do with him?
Are ALL Palace fans to blame ?
That's no way to talk about Nigel Havers![]()
If you actually read the article rather then dismiss it, you’ll notice he talks some sense.
How refreshing that a chairman from a lower club stands up to the elite clubs.
What have the previous admins got to do with him?
Are ALL Palace fans to blame ?
What have the previous admins got to do with him?
Are ALL Palace fans to blame ?
wow. yes, failed tie businesses dont get the chance to reform with their debts wiped.
If you actually read the article rather then dismiss it, you’ll notice he talks some sense.
How refreshing that a chairman from a lower club stands up to the elite clubs.
He seems to be saying that Bury got into trouble because they 'lived beyond their means' and that it all starts with 'over-spending'. Just remind us of his record on this at Palace then?
What have the previous admins got to do with him?
Are ALL Palace fans to blame ?