Search results

Bollox :lolol: light aircraft yes, not a bloody Boeing 767 travelling at 500 mph

Blimey you must got bored and switched it off at 30 seconds :lolol:

I posted a couple of 2-4 minute videos that answer your questions, it's entirely up to you on how you take them. I haven't posted a 3 hour video and insisted everyone watches it. If you can watch a 3 hour video, the ones that I have posted will be really easy.

I answered it with the video explanation. Your turn; Did the towers collapse due to structural failure after being hit by a Boeing 767, travelling at 500mph?

Yes that's what CTers like to claim but apart from this one :facepalm: And it didn't even have a 767 fly into it at 500mph.

WTC7 Debunked;

I don't have to, I already know the answer. How about you answering this simple yes or no question first; Did the towers collapse due to structural failure after being hit by a Boeing 767, travelling at 500mph?

You cannot slip out of it that easy. If you still believe that the WTC towers was a controlled demolition, you would never believe the facts regarding WTC7. Firstly you have to accept that the towers collapsed due to structural failure, then we can move on and discuss WTC7.

Don't you just love it when someone uses a question mark at the end of every sentence :shrug:

You do realise that you will have to remove your head from your ar5e for the eyes to be checked.

You need more than an eye test.

Gravity also played a massive part in it.

Where did I say that? It is clear that you have an over active imagination and you have failed the sanity test.

Of course, it was a hologram wasn’t it.

2+2= 794

Of course it is. He is an attention seeking blogger, who pretended to be a witness to the Ian tomlinson incident. Just because he was in a one off documentary it doesn't mean that he is trustfully employed by the BBC. They contract thousands of people. You make it sound as if he has a long...

I don't know anything about Charlie Veitch or what he stands for, but he is clearly an attention seeker and it is all about a story for self promotion purposes. You have ignored everything I have said about my own research on the WTC.

He listened to explanations of both sides of the debate and came to a rational conclusion. I spoke to an archiect friend of mine to draw a line through the collapse of the towers, but when I have spoken to CTers about the WTC collapse none of them have spoken to anyone in the industry and they...

Some conspiracies theories are plausible, however any CTer that includes 911 in their mantra damages their own credibility. The trouble with the diehard CTer is that they are unable to dismiss fantasy using a rational thought process, and for all intent and purposes never cast a shadow of doubt...

Governments can take advantage of conspiracy theories just to hide what is really going on. Area 51 is an example, pretend to cover something up and see the millions believing in flying saucers whilst they develop technology in secret. All the little green men enthusiasts did a fantastic job in...