Search results

You sound very binary, and I suppose you’re entitled to mistaken interpretation. All sounds a bit millennial if you ask me.

Again, what are you blithering on about? You’ve asserted I don’t like. You’ve asserted I’m angry about. I merely commented about what I’d prefer as a format (because it’s a chat site, clue in the name).

Earning the same as Shearer and Lineker from BBC? Didn’t know they published salaries back then, how much did he earn from BBC?

What are you talking about?!!

Disagree. And you get what you’re fed. Stats stats and endless if he and should he is very dull IMO. Especially as my eyes already saw what the analysis later shows. A dozen angles then in slow motion to see if someones elbow was slightly raised is dull dull dull. And adds to the hyperbole and...

That’s football. But my take would save millions on overly paid BBC pundits and revert to a style with more football that served generations well for decades.

Agree. Lineker well past his time.

Show more football. Less boring interviews and analysis. Save the licence fee holder millions by binning off already extremely wealthy former pros. This formula worked for decades.