Search results

Says the guy who supplied paper clips to the government - what a loser 😂

Maybe if you read the whole thread you’d realise how stupid your post is. My post was BEFORE their recent signing and based on a comparison to big signings from he limes and Man C, Man U, Chelsea. I never said they’d not designed players, but paying £13m for Burn does not equate to £63 for...

As previously stated, IMO they have not spent like Man C, Man U nor Chelsea, even though that was the expectation. Based on when I made the original which was before they broke their transfer record, my point at that time was correct. Some investment was required and none of the fees were...

My original post was that they haven’t spent the big bucks and that is correct and I EXPLICITLY referenced the Manc clubs as an example. Man C (another oil club) spent more on 2 fullbacks than we spent on our stadium. So I stick to my point, Newcastle have not done that. Jeez, Burn was £13m...

10th biggest in the league. So mid table then. Thanks for agreeing with me 👍😂

I’ll keep it simple for you. My point was that they’ve not spent big like the Manc clubs, Chelsea etc. Yes, they’ve added players but not to the extent that was predicted when they were bought by the Saudis. People were saying that they would be throwing hundreds of millions and buying big...

Your usual garbage. Newcastle fans think £13m Burn was a good buy - so it’s subjective. £25m for a proven PL striker is nothing - so the fee for Wood is not extortionate. Strikers cost more. Trippier - £12m - wow. How do you know what his wages are? Guesswork and probably wrong. Pope - £10m...

They haven’t spent mega-bucks though have they. They’ve not done what both Manc clubs have done and, from what they’d said, they don’t intend to. Now that may change, but IMO a lot of the improvements is from Howe and sensible recruitment.