Search results

Good point. I am particularly disappointed at Paul Camillin's attempts to brush all this under the carpet and act as if it never happened.

It's not going to cause me any aggro. Continuing to ask questions is pretty straigtforward.

Thank goodness the people campaigning for our new stadium or to save our club back in 96-97 didn't take that attitude.

I think that's precisely what shouldn't be done, as it will give certain people the idea that they can continue to dish out kangaroo justice without being held in any way responsible, even by the Ombudsman.

Guilty of talking to someone, yes. I imagine he regrets it because of the subsequent two-year ban he received, not because he actually did anything wrong.

You make some valid points, but I don't think bedding into a new stadium is an excuse for lying to suit your agenda, which at least one employee of the club has done in the course of all this.

This is absolutely outrageous and frankly disgraceful that the club (or person(s) within the club) seem to feel they can act as judge, jury and executioner without any kind of internal appeal procedure in place, and wilfully lie in order to make their point. A public apology to the STH in...