You don't come across in your posts as any kind of professional, or even as an adult.
You don't sound intelligent enough to have an intelligent job. Sorry.
An argument is a proposition formed of logical and deductive reasoning, based on evidence.
Sometimes a video or picture can have the quality of evidence. The pasted text from another persons website is not evidence, it is an argument. Unfortunately it is someone else's argument. Presenting...
I said, can crop circles be faked? Yes they can.
I said, is this evidence that any actual case of an actual crop circle is a fake? No it is not.
Your problem is you have no intellectual rigor. Much like Nibbleface.
Yes yes, you rightly dismissed this rubbish when you were 13. How was the beach?
None of my responses are ever intelligible or intelligent, I have the reasoning of a dog, I know I know. How can I be more like you? please help.
When did I call you a slave?
You are supposed to be someone who...
It's easy to google "Shakespeare debunked", and do a massive copy and paste. No doubt you will find someone who has made the case.
- Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? Theories debunked - thestar.com
Unfortunately just copying an entire page of what someone else has said means you are not...
You mean the vast majority of people, who have never questioned who Shakespeare was?
A minority who examine the evidence is likely to be correct, even over a majority, if that majority has not examined the evidence.
What you were implying was clear, and kind of stupid, because nobody denies the existence of these images on the ground. There is lots of footage of people walking into crop circles, examining them close up.
I remember seeing that a guy had made a fake video of a plane crashing into a...
"All the rest of [Shakespeare's] vast history, as furnished by the biographers, is built up, course upon course, of guesses, inferences, theories, conjectures — an Eiffel Tower of artificialities rising sky-high from a very flat and very thin foundation of inconsequential facts" - Mark Twaine...
They were not "potential alternative explanations." You put them forward as being "on the scale of probability".
And your "explanations", as usual, were not qualified with any information. You are not arguing "on the balance of probability", or "all things considered". You are arguing just...
Hold up.
If you work investigating myths, ancient cultures and archeology, then guess what, you are either an academic or a scientist (or perhaps both).
So if you are not an academic or a scientist, you are a liar.
You know, in one of your posts up this page, you actually said that someone...
I have to say, you don't sound much like an academic or a scientist.
Nor have you ever in any conversation I have ever had with you. I think you are just talking BS, working from likelyhood.
Meh its just history. Why are you so sure that everything that you have learned or been taught is the sum total of all that is true?
You need to do something about that attitude mate.